Romney Puts Distance Behind Him After New Hampshire Caucus

Romney Puts Distance Behind Him After New Hampshire Caucus


All signs leading up to the New Hampshire Caucus on January 10, pointed to Mitt Romney running away from his Republican rivals. Even with attacks from the rest of the Republican candidates aimed at him, Romney still came out on top Tuesday night and is now in the drivers seat of the Republican Race.

Romney pulled in 39.3 percent of the votes with Ron Paul in a distant second with 22.9 percent. The remaining candidates finished in the following order: Jon Huntsman (16.9 percent), Newt Gingrich (9.4 percent), Rick Santorum (9.4 percent), Rick Perry (.7 percent).

In the latest Real Clear Politics poll Romney has become the front runner with a 10.6 point lead over Gingrich, followed by Santorum, Paul, Perry and Huntsman.

Following Tuesday night’s caucus, candidates arrived in South Carolina to prepare for the next caucus, one that could be foreshadowing of the Republican candidate.

“If Romney can win South Carolina, he’s probably going to be the nominee,” Gingrich said in a New York Times article. “He has so much money. If he also has the momentum, it’s going to be very hard to stop him.”

Awaiting Romney in South Carolina leading up to the January 21 caucus are intensified attacks from his rivals all of which Romney says will fall flat, addressing Perry and Gingrich by name on Wednesday according to The Wall Street Journal.

Unlike the fall out from Iowa’s caucus, there doesn’t appear to be any of the remaining six candidates deciding to drop out yet and Perry who is sitting in a distant fifth doesn’t feel Romney has it in the bag yet.

“If Mitt’s thinking he’s got it in the bag, he’s in for a surprise,” said the Texas Governor in the Times. “I’m the outsider who’s willing to step on some toes.”

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page



beaver's picture
Submitted by beaver on
The great economist Adam Smith talked about the "unseen rulers of mankind" who rule the world. It doesn't matter whether Obama wins or Romney wins, because we will be continued to be ruled by these "unseen rulers of mankind," who are most likely White capitalists who control the financial empires of the world. Read what Ivy League economists have to say on why the elites extended suffrage to common people (Google "why elites extended suffrage"). The mathematical logic of this paper makes it clear that, ironically, the best action for the rest of us is to completely ignore the political process and not participate in the elections - something that tribal sovereignty demands anyway. Then again, while it doesn't matter whether Obama wins or Romney wins, because we will be ruled by the "unseen rulers of mankind," the biggest fear of our rulers is a revolt or an uprising which will pose a threat to the established order and cause financial losses. My guess is movements like Occupy Wall Street make our rulers nervous, so they would want a president whose personality will be able to calm down revolters and quelch an uprising. Obama being a Black man, they're likely to reason, won't be able to control an uprising and appease those who are revolting. Romney, being a personable White man, will be able to calm down those who revolt, so the game is likely to be played such that Romney wins, even though Obama has done everything the rulers want him to do.