Harvard Professor Confirms Bering Strait Theory Is Not Fact

Simon Moya-Smith

It’s not every day that you get a revered professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School to publicly confirm that the Bering Strait theory is “not a fact."

Well, today I did and later I’ll celebrate over fluffy frybread, powdered sugar and rivers of bottled honey. And why not? That’s American Indian soul food, folks. Consume in moderation? Not today.

David Reich, the aforementioned professor of genetics at Harvard, called me a few minutes ago to chat about his recently published research which promulgates that American Indians immigrated in three subsequent waves to North and South America from Asia via the Bering Strait land bridge starting about, oh, 15,000 years ago.

According to GlobalPost.com, Reich and his team of “60 experts analyzed the genetic data of more than 500 individuals from 52 Native American and 17 Siberian groups looking for similarities and differences.”

What Reich and his team found, as written in the article, is that there’s a good possibility that some American Indians are the direct descendants of—wait for it—Han Chinese.

Well, I thought, the B.S. about the B.S. just keeps getting better and better, doesn’t it? Yes, and sometimes you just have to sit back and watch a brutal wreck unfold and thank your stars that you had nothing to do with the catastrophe that someone will be made to explain and take full responsibility for at some point.

OK then. Back to the call:

Reich, the lead author of the research, said he was quick to buzz me back specifically because I was the first person from an American Indian publication to contact him about the study.

“Well,” I said. “This interview’s going to be a little different. I’ve got questions that a white journalist wouldn’t ask you.”

“OK,” he said with an obvious medley of confidence and concern.

“We all know the Bering Strait theory as just that—a theory,” I said. “When did people … when did scientists elevate it to fact? Is it a fact?”

“No,” he said. “I don’t think it is considered fact. I think that it’s a hypothesis about history, but no, it’s not fact.”

Just then I leapt from my chair in a sudden jolt of joy, consequently scaring the living hell out of the blonde female coffee shop-goer to my right who was, at that very moment, slurping loudly on a cappuccino. With frightened eyes she examined the wooden planks around us for a Black Widow or Brown Recluse—anything menacing that would’ve prompted me to fly from my chair like cat out of water. Once I sat back down, tempering my excitement, the lady grabbed her things and glared at me all the way to a distant table by the window.

“There’s a chance that Indians are not from Asia,” Reich continued. “So far [the Bering Strait theory] is consistent with the data, but it’s possible that it’s wrong. … Further research may prove that it’s wrong.”

I told Mr. Reich that as American Indians we’re oft bullwhipped with the hokum of the Bering Strait theory, even as early as grade school. I know I was—and as I’ve told many people, both friend and foe, it was around the time when I discovered masturbation that my school principal began calling me an “injun” over the loudspeaker every morning just before social studies with that terse teacher who loved to celebrate Columbus Day with cheap Nina, Piñta and Santa Maria cupcakes.

I thanked Reich for his time, grabbed my things and headed for Tocabe—the American Indian eatery in north Denver—to demand that Ben, the owner, fatten me up and then trundle me out. “You’re going to have to be my ride home,” I uttered to my roommate, Juan, over the phone as I hit the gas and took hairpin turns on two wheels en route to the restaurant. “I plan on clogging arteries. Yes, I’m celebrating, you buff dwarf!”

Well, enough about food and reckless driving and short-legged roommates. Right now I’m still high from Reich’s public declaration, one that bloodies the Bering Strait theory like a schlocky shill found fleecing folks in a crowd at a seedy carnival. It’s all smoke and mirrors, bub. And I have yet to encounter a single First Nation conscientious objector who buys into what Bering Strait advocates are doling out in classrooms and university lecture halls across this land … our land.

At this point in this screed I think it’s imperative for me to state that I’m not religious, but I am heavily spiritual. And I’ll continue to have faith in the creation story that was told to me as a curious kid by my elders: We Lakota have been on this land since time immemorial, which is oodles longer than 15,000 years. We emerged from the earth, a wind cave deep in the Black Hills. That’s our creation story, slick, and until theories are made facts, I’ll stick to it … or not. I’m a stubborn creature who gorges on fry bread and brazenly questions Harvard Medical academics just for kicks.

So, here’s the scoreboard: American Indians 1, Bering Strait theory 0. Let’s keep the lead, eh? Hoka.

Simon Moya-Smith is an Oglala Lakota journalist and blogger from Denver. He’ll attend Columbia University School of Journalism in the fall.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page




mdsal's picture
Larry, I would respectfully note that the moment the premises for subjugating knowledge is deconstructed it's certainly euphoric and represents a victory. Again, science, in this case, is not correct - it's proposing a possibility. Creation on this continent remains, as it always has, a valid alternative.
lmann's picture
And also Larry you might wanna research the tens of thousands of Taino’s/ Arawak’s enslaved by Spain beginning in 1491
laura's picture
There is a lot of documentation on the Native slave trade, especially from the southeast to the Islands. Some of my ancestors'- Natchez, Pamunkey, and others were escapees from the slave raids of Brits, French and enemy tribes. As for the theory, I think it has been proven that some Clovis sites, we have ancient ones in GA, SC and of course South America, are older than the Bering Strait theory. And it has been suggested (theorized) that Africans also came over by boat before their slave trade of the colonial times. So yeah, there is probably an ancient history of migrations and mixing that we are only scratching the surface of with new DNA discoveries.
laura's picture
One thing I can't figure out though, is why so many Natives insist that fry bread is quintessentially Native! We didn't have white flour frybread until reservation times! It was cornmeal fritters & tostadas for thousands of years. That's what I grew up on. It was my white ancestors that loved frybread. Oh well, I guess traditions change and new ones are adopted.
marklaroux's picture
a)You're not gonna try that 'indians are from India' thing on us, are you? (never heard that before, I swear) b) That 'blonde female coffee shop goer' wouldn't be Lynn Armitage sipping black cohosh cappuccino would it? (See, we really are ALL RELATED somehow)....weird stuff, huh?
veronicahp's picture
Since when do the 1491s start writing for ICT? It's about dang time. And p.s.? Archaeological (shriek!!) sites in South America proved the existence of indigenous ppls on this continent before the Bering Straits. Wish someone would alert the Smithsonian, Science, every textbook writer, elementary school teacher, and Intro to Native History prof in America....
nightrain's picture
Only non-Native Americans put powdered sugar and honey on frybread.
scottwilliamson's picture
Free advice (for whatever that's worth): Stick to journalism, humor is not your thing.
shotwell77's picture
Started to share this link but it's so poorly written, it's completely unconvincing. And nothing in the article says the Bering Strait theory is actually incorrect (even though evidence from South America definitely points in other directions).
charliafb's picture
Are you joking? Most of my family and a ton of my friends eat their frybread with powdered sugar/honey.