The Four Corners Power Plant

Federal Court Throws Out New EPA Rules on Coal-Plant Emissions for Eastern States

ICTMN Staff
8/21/12

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rule limiting sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions in 28 states, mostly in the eastern U.S., has been overturned by a federal court and sent back for revision.

The rule was aimed at dropping coal plants’ sulfur dioxide emissions by 73 percent and nitrogen oxide by 54 percent, down from 2005 levels, to reduce pollution in states downwind of the plants, according to Reuters. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit told the EPA to revise it, saying that the agency had overstepped its legal bounds in imposing such sweeping regulations, Reuters reported. The EPA’s existing Clean Air Interstate Rule will continue to be the standard while details of the new one, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), are worked out, Reuters said.

CSAPR applied to states mostly in the eastern half of the U.S., plus Texas, but was levied with the idea that the air pollutants, which cause acid rain and smog, cross state lines. Several entities had challenged the new rule, among them Southern Co. and Energy Future Holdings Corp., which claimed that the January 1, 2013, effective date did not provide enough time for them to the special equipment required for compliance, Reuters said.

This is not the first time the EPA has come under fire for issuing rules that allegedly supersede its legal boundaries. Its 2011 revocation of Arch Coal’s permits for the Spruce No. 1 mountaintop mining operation in Virginia caused ire throughout the industry. Last October a federal judge overruled that the agency’s review of waste-disposal permits for several mountaintop-mining operations in Kentucky and West Virginia, according to an Associated Press report, saying that the agency had overreached its authority in initiating the permit reviews.

Although the clean-air regulations the EPA was trying to implement were not directly aimed at Indian country, the health effects of such emissions, especially on the Navajo Nation, are well documented. Read more on coal-plant emissions, clean air and the EPA below.

EPA Releases Emissions Rules for Coal-fired Power Plants

40 Years of Coal-Burning Power Plants on Navajo Land

Coal Power Plants and Mercury on the Navajo Nation

The Cloudy Debate Hovering Over the Navajo Generating Station

Environmental Groups Support Haze Reduction

Navajo Health May Improve With Ozone Curbs

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

sierra's picture
sierra
Submitted by sierra on
Not only no Clean Air allowed from this article; but no clean water allowed; no thorough legal requirement for corporations to clean up Superfund sites; no opposition allowed for the Alberta Tar Sands; no or lax environmental regulations for Chemical Valley near Sarnia, Ontario; no freshwater university science research in Canada allowed; but dumping of unknown chemicals in Lake Superiour allowed..
1