Wet'suwet'en blockade photo courtesy of UNISTOTENCAMP

U.S. and Canada-Wide Protests Target Pacific Trails' Proposed Fracking Pipeline

David P. Ball
11/27/12

Activists in Canada, the U.S. and all the way to Trinidad and Tobago are staging protests on November 27 in support of a blockade against a natural gas pipeline and fracking project  in northern British Columbia.

The demonstrations—planned for California, every major Canadian city, and outside Canada's embassy in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago—come a week after hereditary leaders of the Wet’suwet’en Nation evicted surveyors working on the route of the planned Pacific Trails Pipeline (PTP).

Wet’suwet’en eviction procedures were followed: Surveyors were presented with an eagle feather to surveyors, a traditional warning to remove trespassers from a nation's traditional territory. Contractors' equipment was also confiscated.

“If the Pacific Trails Pipeline decides to push their agenda, along with the federal government and provincial government, to try to force this pipeline through our lands, they're going to continue to meet us, and we're going to keep resisting them,” Toghestiy, a hereditary chief of Wet'suwet'en nation, told Indian Country Today Media Network. “If they decide to escalate it, we'll have to do the same. It's something that we don't want to do, but if they're not willing to sit down and have meaningful consultation with our hereditary chiefs, and with the Wet'suwet'en people, then they're going to be meeting a lot of resistance up here.”

Every day the planned pipeline would transport one million cubic feet of natural gas obtained through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Fracturing injects high-pressure liquid underground, breaking up rock layers to extract gas. It has generated controversy because of chemical pollution, as well as some research suggesting it increases earthquake risks.

The route spans 290 miles from Summit Lake, B.C., to coastal Kitimat, which is also the destination of the controversial Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline. That oil sands project is also under fire from indigenous and environmental groups. The new blockade is on lands of the Wet'suwet'en's Big Frog (Unist’ot’en) clan. PTP is a partnership of Canadian subsidiaries of Apache Corporation and Enron Oil and Gas (EOG) Resources, both based in Houston, Texas. Apache insists it has the support of First Nations along its route.

“We understand that there are some members of the Unist’ot’en who have expressed some concerns, and we continue to consult with First Nations along the entire proposed Pacific Trail Pipeline route, including the Unist’ot’en,” Apache spokesperson Paul Wyke told ICTMN. “The Pacific Trail Pipeline continues to benefit from strong First Nations’ involvement and support for the proposed project. Fifteen of 16 First Nations along the proposed PTP right-of-way support the project.”

But Toghestiy criticized what he said is a decision to ignore hereditary, or traditional, leadership, instead seeking the support of tribal councils. Citing the Delgamuukw case upholding Aboriginal rights and title in Canada's Supreme Court of Canada, Toghestiy vowed to continue blocking PTP.

“The company continues to ignore the hereditary people,” he said. “Instead of dealing with the hereditary people, they decided to deal with the Indian Act government—the people elected into positions that are dependent on federal dollars—to come into the community. These councils don't have any rights outside of the reservations. That's why we're here.”

As part of the company's outreach, PTP Limited Partnership issued a $1.5 million donation in July to an employment skills training project for aboriginal people.

“The benefits of this program are tremendous in reducing the barriers to employment for aboriginal people in northern B.C.,” said Diane Collins, executive director of the PTP Aboriginal Skills Employment Partnership Training Society, in a July 25 statement. “We continue to be the driver of industry specific training programs that are helping establish a First Nations labor force in northern British Columbia.”

Other First Nations have come to the Wet'suwet'en's support. Judy da Silva, an organizer of the decade-long blockade against logging and mercury pollution in Asubpeeschoseewagong (Grassy Narrows) First Nation, in northern Ontario, backed the latest in a series of protests against pipelines across B.C., which have targeted the Northern Gateway, Kinder Morgan's TransMountain, and now PTP.

“When we come together to protect the land, we are doing it for all of our future generations,” she said in a November 26 statement. “This government and all of industry needs to understand that no means no. We will not sacrifice our lands, cultures, and children for their greed.”

In response to a Wet'suwet'en blockader call-for-support last week, organizers say that solidarity demonstrations are planned outside rival pipeline company Kinder Morgan's terminal in Chico, California, as well as in most major Canadian cities, including Toronto, Edmonton, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Prince George, Regina, Vancouver and Victoria.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
Koch Brothers need to be banned from anything that has to do with Mother Earth and Energy sources. Maybe they can climb into bed with Brooke Alexander, a bunch of idoits... Don't support them, ever. Turn your TV off when she appears and starts her mouth going... If you look real hard, you will see the dollar bills just spewing out... Aweful.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
Fracking has destroyed so many streams and wildlife. It pollutes and kills, even people. I saw a documentary on HBO about this and some people could even light there water with a lighter and it burned coming out of there household faucets. Help Stop this Please. Thank you for your work and reporting this, Sarah

talyn's picture
talyn
Submitted by talyn on
So, since I am sure you like to have your home heated, you would be okay with a pipeline in your back yard? There are ways to heat homes that do not risk forever polluting the land those homes are built on. They just aren't as profitable for oil companies.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
SMH, shows how much you think you know. NOT all of us own or drive cars. Ponder that & tuck that in!

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
Why don't you want the jobs that the pipeline would provide? Do you want to be poor? Sheish!
6