Error message

User error: Failed to connect to memcache server: :11211 in dmemcache_object() (line 415 of /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/contrib/memcache/dmemcache.inc).
Courtesy Métis National Council
Pictured, from left, are President David Chartrand, John Morrisseau, President Audrey Poitras and President Clement Chartier in March. The Métis leaders were celebrating the Supreme Court of Canada ruling that the federal government failed to properly distribute land grants that were promised to the Manitoba Métis of the Red River Settlement in 1870.

The Challenge of Mixed-Blood Nations

Duane Champagne
4/25/13

Countries with indigenous nations usually also have mixed-blood nations composed of people of indigenous descent and other nations or races. In an increasingly shrinking world where ethnicity is a quantity in flux, it is sometimes difficult to get a handle on how they relate to one another. The two groups would seem to be natural allies. But the reality isn’t that simple.

To begin with, much depends on the relations of the mixed bloods to the larger nation state. Take Canada, where the mixed-blood community is called Métis, a French word meaning—well, mixed blood. The Métis historically have had friendly relations with Indian communities. But currently they claim their own history and culture, a hybrid of European and indigenous community. Some Métis identify and live with tribal communities, while others do not. These separatists believe themselves to be a distinct nation or ethnic group from the indigenous nations and from Canada. Métis communities in Canada have separate land claims and negotiations with the Canadian government.

Meanwhile, in Latin and South America, as well as in Africa, people of mixed blood usually do not strongly identify with indigenous nations. They tend to reject indigenous ways in favor of national culture. Mestizos, for instance, are persons of indigenous ancestry who have taken up national culture and do not live in or engage with members of indigenous tribal communities.

This disengagement, in fact, can be quite vehement. Mestizo nations like Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, and many others segregate their indigenous communities and maintain hostile and repressive political and cultural relations over indigenous nations. As for assimilated Mestizos, they can generally be relied on to embrace the values and lifestyles of modern market economies and broad national culture while openly rejecting their indigenous counterparts.

In the United States, the situation is particularly complex because there is no official designation of a mixed-blood nation. Mixed-blood individuals, if they qualify as a member of a tribe, can choose tribal membership. Many tribal communities have blood quantum criteria as low as a quarter; some, like the Cherokee, allow membership if a person can prove lineal descent on one of the official Cherokee rolls collected by the federal government. As it is, mixed bloods who do not qualify for tribal membership may be U.S. citizens, but they do not have indigenous rights.

Recognizing these issues is vital because census data over the past two decades suggests that there are at least several million people in the U.S. who are of mixed indigenous and other race descent and who are probably not tribal members. Many mixed bloods consider indigenous ancestry as one ancestral line among several nationalities that came to the U.S. Mixed bloods can be of English, German, Japanese or any number of other nationalities, as well as being descended from an Indian tribe.

During the period of forced assimilation, from the 1890s to 1960, many mixed bloods undoubtedly rejected Indian identity and the communities and cultures that went with it. They were likelier to hide references to an indigenous lineal background. But with the rise of the various ethnic movements of the 1960s, many individuals have proudly claimed Indian descent, even if they don’t have direct contact or cultural participation in a tribal community.

Indeed, in the past few decades, mixed bloods in the U.S. have been more understanding toward indigenous identity and the issues confronting tribal communities. While millions of U.S. mixed bloods are not tribal members, they are proud of their Indian ancestry. You can often find them on the front lines of political activism as allies and supporters of indigenous rights and issues. It can safely be said that today, Indian mixed bloods in the U.S. have formed an ethnic group that often identifies with indigenous needs.

Thus, Indigenous Peoples and mixed-blood communities might, at first glance, appear to have much in common. But depending on the country and its history, their interests aren’t always congruent. Indigenous mixed-blood relations can be cordial, even warm. Or they can be fraught with tension—or worse.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Arnold Mallory's picture
Arnold Mallory
Submitted by Arnold Mallory on
All four of my grandparents are listed on the 1903 Indian rolls, try this on "high Blood!'

mkalrya@yahoo.com's picture
mkalrya@yahoo.com
Submitted by mkalrya@yahoo.com on
Mixed blood term is just as offensive as the term "breed".many of us have a heritage that for whatever reason was hidden from us. I'd like to know how if you are a Hollywood actor you automatically are landless an American Indian. no percentages asked

Joseph Redhorn's picture
Joseph Redhorn
Submitted by Joseph Redhorn on
Being of mixed mixed blood, father's side Siberian Russian (Ethnics: Manchurian, Even, Evenki, Kazakh and Yakut) and mother of Native stock (Huron, Cheyenne, Blackfoot and Apache), I myself relate to the Native Causes and see myself as a Non-Rez First Nations blood. Proud of It.

Sonya Goff
Sonya Goff
Submitted by Sonya Goff on
As a person of "mixed blood" the condescension and or disbelief which often follows my claim to Native ancestry is most derogatory. If I say "My ancestors were Scottish." No one razes an eyebrow, but claim my Cherokee heritage on both sides of my family tree and I get that "yeah right" look. Because I have hazel eyes and a fair complexion. and don't carry around " the papers to prove it" I can't possibly be of Native decent . I was denied my heritage most of my life, as were many of my generation. Now we must struggle to learn what others were taught as children and are mocked and ridiculed . So be it. Are You trying to learn Tsalagi? Why not? After all you're "pure blood" and so "superior". Learning your ancestral language and teaching it to your children should be a priority.

Ernie Crey's picture
Ernie Crey
Submitted by Ernie Crey on
In Canada, blood quantum is not a factor in determining who is an "Indian". You are an Indian if you meet the criteria as set out in the federal Indian Act. Before 1985, if you were a white woman and you married an Indian man, you became an Indian. This legal quirk has since changed, but in Canada this purely legal definition of who is an Indian means that there are hundreds and hundreds of "Indians" in Canada who have absolutely no Aboriginal heritage.

Elizabethe Decolonized Thundercloud
Elizabethe Deco...
Submitted by Elizabethe Deco... on
I do not consider myself a seperate entity from my full blood relatives. Unfortunately, I find that many of my relatives have issues with me. It is completely their issue & not mine. I do find it pretty interesting, that as often as I fight to make certain indigenous voices are not just heard, but fully included in social justice/evironmental issues, I have those I would call "haters". I had 2 full blood grandmothers, one full blood grandfather, one mixed blood grandfather. Its interesting that central & south americans know I am indigenous just by looking at me, however the very people I am part of, want to act as if I don't exist or snipe at me behind my back. I am not going to stop doing what I need to as an activist for my people, regardless of how I am treated, but I do think it is sad & I don't think native people can afford to be hateful. Look at all the obstacles we have set against us. Why we would stoop to hatred is beyond me.
6