Thinkstock
Slate magazine Editor David Plotz has banned the use of the Washington team's name from its publication.

Slate Magazine Bans 'Redskins' Name From Its Publication

ICTMN Staff
8/8/13

Slate magazine announced Thursday that this will be the final article where they will refer to the Washington football team as the ‘Redskins.’

Editor David Plotz wrote in an editorial that it’s high time Native Americans are recognized as human beings and not caricatures or relics of the past.

“Changing the way we talk is not political correctness run amok,” he wrote. “It reflects an admirable willingness to acknowledge others who once were barely visible to the dominant culture, and to recognize that something that may seem innocent to you may be painful to others.” 

Photo courtesy Wikipedia.org

Plotz added that if the American populace decidedly changes the way they speak, it will inevitably shift the way they think – especially with regard to racist Native American mascots in professional sports.

“Changing how you talk changes how you think,” he wrote. “The adoption of the term ‘African-American’—replacing ‘Negro’ and ‘colored’—in the aftermath of the civil rights movement brought a welcome symmetry with Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans, groups defined by geographic origin rather than by race or color.”

In his article, Plotz refers to Redskins owner Dan Snyder as “a dismal failure as an owner, a megalomaniacal bully, and a frivolous litigant.”

Snyder has openly declared that he favors his team’s name, does not believe it is offensive and that he will “NEVER” change it.

Slate is one of a growing chorus of publications that have openly rejected the name and discontinued the use of it in their stories.

The Kansas City Star has had a long-established editorial policy against using ‘Redskins’ in its publication.

Public Editor Derek Donovan wrote in September 2012 that he is fervently against the name and that it is a disparaging pejorative.

“I remain unconvinced by every argument I’ve ever heard that the name is not a racial epithet, plain and simple,” he wrote.

According to Plotz, the Washington City Paper, Senior Editor of the New Republic Gregg Easterbrook and journalists at the Buffalo News and the Philadelphia Daily News have also banned the use of the name.

Related Story:  Redskins Players Backpedal on Name Change

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Kara_Briggs's picture
Kara_Briggs
Submitted by Kara_Briggs on
The Oregonian in Portland stopped publishing the name of the Washington team in February, 1992."It was felt that we were perpetuating stereotypes that were damaging the dignity and the self-respect of these people," then Oregonian Sports Editor Jeff Wohler told the American Journalism Review that year. Journalists of color led the change, including Wilda Wahpepah, Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, who was an editor at the paper in 1992.

Michael Madrid's picture
Michael Madrid
Submitted by Michael Madrid on
I suppose it's no surprise that the ONLY people I know who have insisted that Redskins IS NOT a racial slur are generic White people (generic because they have no idea of their own roots). Racism is alive and well in the U.S. Look at Paula Dean and her comments about Black Americans. Look at all the signs carried by idiot Tea Party members depicting Obama as an African Native. The only compensation we have is the knowledge that these types often show their ignorance every time they open their mouth.
2