Judge Denies Cobell Class Representatives $8.2 Million
Senior D.C. District Court Judge Thomas Hogan has denied $8.2 million in fees for class representatives involved in the Cobell class-action trust lawsuit.
Hogan’s ruling, issued March 20, rejected the Cobell class representatives’ second request since 2011 to receive incentive awards and reimbursements for litigation-support debts their lawyers say they incurred during the long-running lawsuit focused on federal mismanagement of tribal trust lands.
A $3.4 billion settlement to the case was approved by Hogan in August 2011, and class members are in the process of receiving payments as a result of that settlement; the tribe-focused land buy-back portion of the agreement, which accounts for $1.9 billion of the settlement, is ongoing as well.
The issues involved in Hogan’s latest ruling apply only to a select few class representatives involved in the case. In January 2011, lead plaintiff Elouise Cobell and other class representatives – Louise Larose, Thomas Maulson, and Peggy Cleghorn – petitioned the court for $10.5 million in combined incentive awards and cost reimbursements. Cobell, the lead class representative, passed away in October 2011; her family continues to monitor the case’s proceedings.
Hogan denied their petition in June 2011, and he upheld the denial in his most recent ruling, saying that the new motion advanced arguments and evidence that could have been raised by the plaintiffs before the court originally ruled and entered judgment on the matter. He indicated that the new arguments were flawed in a variety of ways, specifically referring at length to arguments made by Cobell lawyer Keith Harper during the previous hearing on the matter.
Hogan noted in his ruling that the motion to reconsider asked for $8.2 million, as opposed to the original $10.5 million, and he expressed concern that “the only explanation the plaintiffs proffered for the difference in expense amounts sought in the incentive-award petition versus those sought in the motion for reconsideration was that the ‘plaintiffs, with reluctance, seek reconsideration only of those amounts necessary to pay outstanding loans, repayable grants and plaintiffs’ experts to which they remain in arrears.’”
The Cobell lawyers argued that class representatives personally owe the Lannan Foundation $4.5 million for its financial assistance during the case, and that the Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, which Cobell directed, owes another $500,000 to the Lannan Foundation, as well as $600,000.00 to the Otto Bremer Foundation – “which also was never mentioned in the incentive-award petition or during the fairness hearing,” Hogan wrote – $1.2 million to Pricewaterhouse Coopers, $704,000 to Charles River Associates, and $130,000.00 to RSH Consulting.”
You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page