An Agreement Is Reached Regarding Scalps at the Karl May Museum

Red Haircrow
6/14/14

In the months since the scalp situation at the Karl May Museum in Radebeul, Germany was brought to the general attention of Indian country, by majority in the German news media, repatriation requests have been presented with amusement at the absurdity of the idea. Alongside stereotypical quips about “wild and excitable” Indians “being on the warpath,” these attitudes negatively reinforced public opinion that backed the museum’s initial refusal, as they felt the items were simply purchased legal property.

At the Bild.de, a regional newspaper, writer Jürgen Helfricht even questioned if some or all of the scalps were actually authentic, saying it might be a “crazy war” on the part of Natives, which might be true if they were fakes. The museum’s director and former curator stated when interviewed, “We do not even know 100 percent if all really come as genuine scalps of human heads. They are only the statements of museum founder Patty Frank. These have never been investigated scientifically.”

Since the circumstances began, director Claudia Kaulfuß announced the replacement of Hans Grunert, with a much younger curator, Robin Leipold, reported to be pro-Native and supportive of repatriation. Soon thereafter, the museum modified their position requesting intervention by Merkel’s government, later deferring decision by sending the scalps to a larger museum or organization. A concession was made to remove the “original” scalps from display, and place them in storage. Though appreciated, from Native perspective, still having the scalps was unacceptable.

As mentioned in the March article for ICTMN, Cecil Pavlat of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians in Michigan learned one of the scalps was reportedly of Ojibwe origin, and wrote requesting repatriation. Gathering support of Natives and concerned others on both sides of the Atlantic, he considered protesting the museum’s stance at the festival in honor of their patron. Other Natives had already done so, such as artist and philanthropist Jana Mashonee, who made a public announcement on her website: “I have officially removed myself from performing at the Karl May Festival...in quiet protest to the recent actions of the Karl May Museum and its culturally insensitive management of Native American artifacts at the museum.”

RELATED: Tribes Demand Return of Native Scalps From Karl May Museum in Germany

The Karl May Festival is an annual event in which organizers invite many Native Americans to perform. This year it was May 30-June 1. Though it continues to be a controversial event by those who question supporting cultural appropriation that can inspire further activity, there are those who see it as an opportunity to educate and accurately portray parts of Native culture. This year’s theme was “Indian Spirit,” focusing on the sharing of spiritual concepts, ceremonies and dances.

Pages

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Michael Madrid's picture
Michael Madrid
Submitted by Michael Madrid on
Gross! As an Apache, I can't understand the notion of taking part of an enemy's body to keep with you. I DO understand the notion that somewhere a Native spirit is restless for not being buried "whole." People in the U.S. don't understand that displaying body parts is disrespectful, how can we expect Germans to comprehend that notion?
1