Grand Canyon Timelapse: The Living Landscape (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D-Tf-oSVLE)
The Grand Canyon Escalade project is slated at the confluence of the Little Colorado and Colorado rivers in northern Arizona.

Controversial Grand Canyon Gondola Grounded for a Year

Anne Minard
7/17/14

A tourist attraction proposed for the Navajo side of the Grand Canyon has been delayed by a year, because the controversial plan didn’t make it on the Navajo Nation Council’s summer legislative agenda.

A Phoenix-based development group, the Confluence Partners, fronted the plan in 2012 to build Grand Canyon Escalade, which would occupy 420 acres near the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers, just east of Grand Canyon National Park. The development’s main draw would be the “Escalade” Gondola Tramway, carrying tourists to the Canyon floor. Once there, visitors could walk along an 1,100-foot elevated riverwalk, eat at a restaurant, or visit an amphitheater and terraced grass seating area overlooking the Colorado River. The development would also include a Navajo cultural center and retail and art galleries.

Since the plan’s unveiling, it has been the subject of opposition by the Hopi Tribe, Grand Canyon river runners, and Navajo families living near the Confluence who say such a development would be inappropriate at the remote and sacred site.

Lamar Whitmer, of Confluence Partners, said all the necessary approvals are in place, and the legislation was delivered to the Navajo Nation three months ago. As a next step, it would have been assigned a legislation number by the Navajo Nation Speaker’s office, but Jared Touchin, spokesman for the office, said the legislation never arrived; he suspects there were legal issues that remain to be resolved. The deadline for consideration in the legislative Summer Session was Tuesday, July 8.

“Because we haven’t been able to get to the Council in a timely fashion, the opening will be pushed back until May 2018,” Whitmer said. The previous opening date was the summer of 2017. “It’s disappointing, having gotten to know the people in the area and the need that exists in western Navajo for jobs and economic opportunity.”

According to the Confluence Partners, the development would create more than 2,000 jobs, most of them for Navajo people, and would generate $50 to $95 million annually for the tribe. They say a significant portion of proceeds would also benefit residents of the Bennett Freeze, where development was prohibited for decades because of land disputes with the Hopi Tribe.

Residents of the Bodaway Gap Chapter, within which the development would take place, voted 59-52 in the fall of 2012 to approve the plan. But families who live in the area have banded together to form a group called Save the Confluence, which has been adamantly opposed to Escalade. They allege, among other wrongs, that their neighbors were bullied and tricked into supporting the project.

Renae Yellowhorse, a Save the Confluence member, said the Confluence Partners and their opponents have presented to the Council in recent weeks, but she said the main efforts of the Confluence Partners have taken place behind closed doors.

“Their presentation at the Council was a show,” she said. “We thought they were going to bring substance. Instead, after 10 minutes of Albert Hale [of Confluence Partners] speaking, it went directly into a Power Point presentation and a show about Hawaii, theater. If that’s the kind of Disney Land-ish thing he wants to bring to the edge of the Grand Canyon, no. That’s not how we want our stories told. We’re here. We’re not a story from the 1800s. We’re not Pocahantas on the Rim. It was offensive.”

Pages

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Diana DeChilly
Diana DeChilly
Submitted by Diana DeChilly on
I'd like to see the financials of the Confluence Partners. Shame on our Navajo leaders if they get attempt to finance this project. My vote at Navajo election time will be whether the candidate is for or against this unacceptable project.

CJKlepper's picture
CJKlepper
Submitted by CJKlepper on
This project (Grand Canyon Gondola) should be the least of the Navajo Nations legislative agenda. I am seeing "red" as HUD has asked for the return of the $96 million for which the Navajo Nation failed to comply with the Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act. This is another example of the ineptness of the past and current administration in handling fundings from the Feds. In the meantime, there are a lot of elderly and down-and-out Navajos still living in "shacks/hogans" on the reservation without running water and electricity This request for the return of the $96 million could have been used for the projects for which it was intended and allocated.going back to 2012. Question: Where did this money go? Could some of it have been comingled into allocation for discretionary funds of which some of the council delegates have been accused of abscounding for personal use? Council Delegate Katherine Benally, to whom the July 8th letter from HUD was addressed, is one person who should not have been Chairwoman for the Resouces and Development Committee, or any committee within the tribal government. She has been repeatedly named over the years, including the discretionary funds mismanagement, of various misdeeds in her capacity as council delegate, committe member, and now as the chairwoman of RDC. It's ashamed the majority of her constituents are elders who keep voting for her with all the cow patties she gives them. As for this Grand Canyon Gondola project, personally knowing those involved in this project presumed to be for the benefit of the Navajo Nation it all boils down one person (a fox in chicken coop) who along with his partners will be cheating his own people again.

Roxanne Roxanadanna
Roxanne Roxanadanna
Submitted by Roxanne Roxanadanna on
Something beyond insufficient regard for the sacredness of a site enjoyed by all appears to be present; all should suspect bribery of some sort.

Roxanne Roxanadanna
Roxanne Roxanadanna
Submitted by Roxanne Roxanadanna on
Something beyond insufficient regard for the sacredness of a site enjoyed by all appears to be present; all should suspect bribery of some sort.
4