1928 Pontiac Indian head mascot

New/Old Ways to Offend Indians: When Cars Assume Ethnic Identities

ICTMN Staff
6/21/13

"For decades, American Indian tribal names have helped to propel automobiles out of showrooms," writes Glenn Collins for The New York Times. "Return with us now to the era when Pontiac’s sales brochures carried illustrations comparing its 6-cylinder engines to six red-painted, feathered cartoon Indian braves rowing a canoe.

"Or review Pontiac’s marketing copy, which proclaimed that 'among the names of able Indian warriors known to the white race in America, that of Pontiac, chief of the Ottawas and accepted leader of the Algonquin family of tribes, stands pre-eminent.' Of course, the visage of the chief was appropriated as a hood ornament."

(From the brochure collection of Steve Hayes/The New York Times)

And returning to showrooms for 2014 is the Jeep Cherokee. The Cherokee was replaced by Jeep with the Liberty in 2002, and many Native Americans were glad to see it go. But today, with all that's being debated over the use of offensive Native imagery, nicknames and logos in sports (see, for example, the Washington Redskins, Chicago Blackhawks and the Cleveland Indians' Chief Wahoo), why would Jeep make this move now?

Well, "market research"apparently tells them that there is a fondness for the Cherokee model name, so they're bringing it back to boost sales. Yes, it's all a profit game.

According to Collins, though, the company says it respects changed attitudes toward stereotyping. “We want to be politically correct, and we don’t want to offend anybody,”  Jim Morrison, director of Jeep marketing said. Regarding the Cherokee name, he added: “We just haven’t gotten any feedback that was disparaging.”

Well, here’s someone writes Collins: “We are really opposed to stereotypes,” said Amanda Clinton, a spokeswoman for the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. “It would have been nice for them to have consulted us in the very least.”

Giving the new Jeep its old tribal name may have seemed just another acceptable risk for the company. After all, any publicity may be good publicity, even if it's negative from the Native Peoples whose name is being used to market a vehicle.

“If you have a name that offends nobody, then you end up with a forgettable brand” that won’t cling to the memory, said Allen Adamson, managing director of the New York office of Landor Associates, a brand and corporate identity consultancy.

Read the entire New York Times article by Glenn Collins, which includes a photo gallery, by clicking HERE.

Related: Lewis DeSoto Makes Art You Can Drive

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

John D. 's picture
John D.
Submitted by John D. on
I don't understand - if it was offensive, people wouldn't be interested. If it was a statement to be injurious, it wouldn't be of interest either. I believe that many did love the native heritage enough to want to name their "brands" with the first Americans. I was raised to see the positive in it. I don't understand why there's a need to see the negative now.

Randy Johnson 's picture
Randy Johnson
Submitted by Randy Johnson on
I had never thought much of the use if native names on products,teams,and etc. until I discover my native bloodline and begin to learn the real history of the white invasion if the America's . If the use if Naitve names are used as a symbol if power and respect much like the Chevrolet named after a celebrated race car driver it's I feel acceptable to some degree ,but also can be a very gray area too . For corporations have one thing in their mind ,money, and in the efforts of making it, gave no problem connecting sacred symbolism if others to cartoons and other belittlements to make a dollar. This is where the shame of their so caled ignorance plays its hand. In doing so ,it may just be as well to have stayed away from real life scenarios and people and stuck with with those non-living things as stars, or galaxies etc.
3