Custer-Friendly Official Has Backing of Republican National Committee

Rob Capriccioso
8/27/12

WASHINGTON – The Republican National Committee (RNC) is standing by a top leader with the organization who said that Col. George Armstrong Custer was “dishonored” when New Mexico’s governor met with American Indians earlier this year.

The embattled RNC executive committee member is Pat Rogers, a GOP lobbyist and partner with the Modrall law firm of Albuquerque, New Mexico. He wrote the following words in an e-mail to the staff of Republican New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez in June after her tribal meeting was announced: “The state is going to hell. Col. [Allen] Weh would not have dishonored Col. Custer in this manner.” Weh was a Republican candidate for state governor who ran against Martinez in 2010.

The e-mail, reported on by Indian Country Today Media Network on August 24, was obtained by Independent Source PAC and publicized by ProgressNow New Mexico, both liberal advocacy organizations.

Rogers’ words have since made nationwide headlines, and he has drawn few defenders, although the RNC has ignored calls for his dismissal.

"We disagree with Committeeman Rogers' comments, and he has rightfully apologized for them,” Ted Kwong, a spokesman for the RNC, told ICTMN over the weekend.  “We are a big tent party that is focused on speaking to all Americans who want a different direction after nearly four years of deficit spending and failed leadership. We will continue to talk about how to create jobs for the 23 million Americans who are looking for work, despite the desperate efforts by Democrats to make this election about anything but their dismal economic record."

Rogers’ apology came in an August 25 Albuquerque Journal article, in which he said he was attempting to be funny: “I made a poor attempt at humor in a private e-mail, and it’s being twisted by a partisan group,” he told the newspaper. “I certainly intended no offense, but I do apologize.”

Many American Indians have not taken Rogers’ words as a joke, and the RNC has not heeded calls for a reprimand. Officials there also did not acknowledge that he has not apologized directly to American Indians.

“He has apologized, no other changes to announce,” Kwong said when pressed on whether Rogers will continue to serve with the RNC. Kwong would not say if Rogers was available for an interview. Rogers has not responded to several requests from ICTMN.

The apology and the RNC’s reaction have fallen flat in many circles of Indian country.

“Only the geniuses at the Republican National Committee could figure out a way to send out an apology about Native Americans without mentioning Native Americans,” said Chris Stearns, a Navajo lawyer and chairman of the Seattle Human Rights Commission.

“It is appalling that one of the leading organizers of the RNC is spewing such garbage,” said Rhonda LeValdo-Gayton, president of the Native American Journalists Association. “I wonder if he even knows that Custer didn't deal with the tribes in New Mexico?”

Rather, Custer battled Indians in Dakota Territory, including Lakota and Cheyenne citizens. He and his troops killed many American Indians during what were historically known as the Indian Wars, and he was killed in 1876 at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

“[T]his country doesn't need someone like Mr. Rogers who appreciated or held in high regard a person who helped carry out the genocide of Native people,” added LeValdo-Gayton, a citizen of the Acoma Pueblo, which is based in New Mexico. “Right now, those tribes in New Mexico contribute to the state economy with their uniqueness that brings in tourists from all over the world.”

LeValdo-Gayton noted that her people were never moved from their land, they never signed a treaty, and they maintained their unique cultures and languages like all the other pueblos, which she said was impressive to even President Abraham Lincoln in his day.

“Mr. Rogers, all our Native nations across this country have a history that you need to fully understand before dishonoring Native people again,” LeValdo-Gayton said.

Officials with the Navajo Nation, the largest tribe in New Mexico, have also rebuked Rogers, as has Martinez, whose staff said she is proud of her relationship with New Mexico tribes.

The Republican National Convention is scheduled to take place this week in Tampa, Florida, with Rogers in attendance.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

leeanntallbear's picture
leeanntallbear
Submitted by leeanntallbear on
After Abramhof, tribes should have learned their lesson, unless they don't think being thought of as "monkeys" is not offensive. Cut off, stop or withdraw all financial contributions to Republican candidates, events,causes, etc. Granted, the lobbyists "advising" you to make donations to any Republican candidates, schmoozing parties, etc. will scream to high heaven, but so what? Is tribal leadership going to hide in the corner, the back of the room, under the table, or stand up and be treated with respect? Flex your muscles, tribal leadership - caucus and tell RNC to get rid of this guy or you will turn off the money spigot. That is how this country works - unfortunately. You are not being "overly sensitive" and you are not just part of America's forklore - a cartoon character in a Disney cartoon. You are our tribal leadership and if you don't have the backbone to stand up for us -you should step down.

tmsyr11's picture
tmsyr11
Submitted by tmsyr11 on
I only wish these Indian Representatives/Tribal Officials ARE just as adamantly opposed to OTHERs, i.e. ‘non-Republicans’, being just as careless with words or with irresponsible actions. And if these Reps/Officials ARE calling out - unfortunately for ICT articles – readers are not seeing OTHER ICT - HEADLINE NEWS. Every now and then ICT puts out fair analysis – but for ICT to pin GA Custer to the Republican Committee is FALSE! George A. Custer was a member of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY! To portray Custer other than a DEMOCRAT is not true and misguided. I don’t believe the 2012 National (SOCIALIST) Democratic Party has renounced George Custer at all. If today’s Democrats renounce him, it is likely then Custer is too much a Democrat Right. Therefore, another Democrat thrown under the bus! You want RESPECT? I still hadn’t seen an apology or acknowledgement on use of codename “GERONIMO” in the Bin laden raid by Barack Obama but instead W/H questions referred to the US Defense Dept. Navajo Chairman Shelly did say something. RESPECT? Mainstream NBC/ABC/CBS routinely, take Indian culture/traditions out of context, i.e. Matt Lauer, TODAY NBC Show, use of “indian giver”. RESPECT? I am satisfied the (“God-awful White-man Republican”) owned up to his irresponsibility unlike many National Democratic officials (careless) who seemingly get a (PASS every-time) from those Indians who call themselves – representatives. And WE ALL know who you are as we see your pointy heads from your pointy brown hoods….B@@!

gsevalikova's picture
gsevalikova
Submitted by gsevalikova on
YOU!!! Tmsyr11! You do the Republican Party no favors whatsover in these dangerous times we live in by defending Pat rogers, who may be a Nazi sympathiser or other kind of white supremacist-there is ample evidence that hardcore elements are trying to get Americans of ALL stripes to turn on each other while war of the worst kind is brewing overseas and martial law is gearing up right here under a possible false flag scenario. If this is at all your intent,you are being called out. Fascist/Communusts/Fundamentalists/ of all sorts are more alike than different-any person who fled those horrors,like my parents can certainly vouch for that. So, just why ARE you on this website anyway?

Michael Fredde's picture
Michael Fredde
Submitted by Michael Fredde on
This kind of behavior from a "republican" is normal to me. The greedy right wing of america only want one thing. They want everyone to be just like them in religious/spiritual beliefs, out look on life, and to care about only themselves and not their neighbors. They say there is no aristocracy in the United States, but there is. They are all the congressmen and women and senators whether they are republican or democrat who sit in their ivory towers never having to worry about an income for the rest of their lives even if they only serve one term and never have to depend on private medical insurance or social security like most of us do.
4