Oday Minan/Facebook
Idle No More protesters outside the January 11 meeting between the Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, 19 other chiefs and Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Cross-Canada Indigenous Blockades Highlight Idle No More Tactics' Tensions

David P. Ball
1/16/13

 

Today's plans for cross-country blockades to disrupt Canada's economy and infrastructure are revealing tensions within both the Idle No More movement and aboriginal leadership in the country, sparking debate over what tactics are appropriate in the quest for Native self-determination and who gets to police that line.

After more than a month of protests, hunger strikes, social media–organized flash mobs, round dances and teach-ins—and in the wake of Friday's meeting between national aboriginal leadership and Prime Minister Stephen Harper—the sincerity of Harper's pledge to focus on First Nations issues is being discussed heatedly among activists from coast to coast.

Also under discussion is what to do about it. There are those who want to continue action, in line with Chief Theresa Spence’s ongoing fast—which continues despite the January 11 meeting between Prime Minister Stephen Harper and 20 chiefs, including the National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), Shawn A-in-chut Atleo. And there are those who think the goal of getting Harper to the table was met, and are willing to see what happens before conducting more action. At the root of the debate is whether the meeting was too little, too late, and whether it even signifies that Harper is finally taking aboriginal concerns seriously, which many doubt.

“The best way First Nations and other Canadians can express their disappointment with federal indifference is to translate their concerns into action,” said Patrick Madahbee, Grand Council Chief of the Anishinabek Nation, in a statement on January 15. “Harper may have pulled the wool over some people’s eyes last week in Ottawa, but Chief Theresa Spence is still fasting for justice. We call on other Canadians to be understanding and supportive of our efforts in the days ahead to demonstrate to members of the Harper caucus that they were not elected to ignore the will of the people.”

Civil disobedience activities are planned for January 16 across the country.

“This is a day of action,” proclaimed a poster for railway blockades planned for January 16 on Gitxsan territory in British Columbia. “We will blockade the CN Rail to show that we are answering the call to all First Nations across Canada to oppose the bills that will affect the sacred waters and traditional territories of our Nation and future generations.”

Another prominent railway blockade, of both CN and CP's major cross-Canada routes, has been announced by former Roseau River First Nation chief Terrance Nelson in Manitoba.

“This isn’t a round dance, this will have consequences,” Nelson told APTN News. “It will block everything going east and west.”

Other highway and rail line disruptions have been announced in several other provinces, including Highway 401 near Windsor, Ontario; the Ambassador Bridge, North America's busiest border crossing, between Ontario and Michigan; the Trans-Canada highway near Nipigon, Ontario; and New Brunswick's Centennial Bridge.

But the direct action plans were questioned by one of Idle No More's founding women in Saskatchewan.

“Those portray a message of aggressiveness,” Sylvia McAdam told CBC News. “That's not peaceful. There has to be a purpose behind it.”

For former Neskonlith band chief Arthur Manuel, chairman of the Indigenous Network on Economies and Trade, an indigenous rights advocacy organization, direct action such as blockades are an important tool in resisting the loss of Native rights. His British Columbia community has itself seen such protests over ski resorts and mining.

“What the government's trying to do is force indigenous people into extinguishing their rights through these comprehensive land claims and self-government agreements—to relinquish those treaty and aboriginal rights,” he told ICTMN. “These actions say, No, we're not going to do that.”

On January 15, Manuel released a letter sharply critical of the AFN, which he alleged has been attempted to prevent economic disruption and “limit the scope of Idle No More (INM) actions” that have escalated with the rising tide of Native activism. Like Derek Nepinak, Grand Chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, and several other leaders, Manuel opposed the AFN's participation in talks with Harper, agreed to in the wake of Chief Theresa Spence's nearly 40-day fast, as lacking substance or success.

“They've ridden the coattails of Theresa Spence and Idle No More,” Manuel said of the national First Nations leadership. “They agreed to negotiate process with the government; that's standard opportunist kind of activity. The people are not going to benefit at all. It's not going to change anything.”

Another of Idle No More's founding organizers in Saskatchewan, Sheelah McLean, said direct action such as blockades are sometimes necessary, but only as a last resort.

“There are indigenous groups historically that have used blockades very strategically, with the help of elders, advisors and ceremony,” she said. “Our vision was for education and building consciousness with Canadians to stop the bills. We do want to support peaceful actions, and we do feel that people hitting the streets in the thousands does have a huge impact. There's pressure to our Members of Parliament to actually represent citizens as they're paid to do. We believe this is the most powerful weapon, and what we'll continue to use.”

The blockades come a day after Ontario's top police officer admitted that such actions could have a powerful disruptive effect on the entire country's economy, but said police are reluctant to intervene if it could escalate tensions.

“First Nations have the ability to paralyze this country by shutting down travel and trade routes,” said Chris Lewis, commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police, in a video statement on January 15. “It is a difficult situation no matter how we view or address it.”

With some organizers of Idle No More, aides to Chief Theresa Spence, and Assembly of First Nations leaders chiming in with varying opinions of protest tactics over the past month, McLean admits that internally policing protesters simply isn't feasible with such a movement.

“To think that any one group or person could possibly police a movement this large is ludicrous to me,” she told ICTMN. “People do have a lot of autonomy in how they enact the vision. But the vision of education and building community is really key to the movement. That's what so many people were originally excited about, and why it has resonated with so many people—because there's a truth to the idea that we are supposed to have a nation-to-nation relationship.”

Manuel worries that the participation of AFN in government negotiations will isolate more militant grassroots indigenous people and the Idle No More movement alike, particularly if laws are broken as in blockades.

“The real ugly part of what they're trying to do by getting the AFN to collaborate with them through consultations about process is they are setting up the activists to be arrested and attacked by the police,” he told ICTMN. “They're going to say that the 'reasonable' leaders like [Atleo] have agreed to consult with us; the INM is therefore no longer needed, and we're going to use the RCMP to crush it. It's really down to a crossroads right now. Indigenous people need to realize that the next level of the fight is going to be whether or not INM can maintain its credibility in view of the fact that the AFN has agreed to collaborate on consultations.”

But as some leaders criticize blockades as unnecessarily alienating non-Natives as well as established leadership such as the AFN itself, Manuel explained that ultimately it must be up to each individual community to determine its best course of action in the fight for their rights, and there are risks with both approaches.

“I understand what they're saying with blockades,” he said. “Sometimes people need to be very cognizant about whether or not they're taking two steps back and one step forward. It's the same kind of caution I'm telling people who are trying to negotiate at every twist and turn, when the government's totally stubborn and obstinate: Be careful there. But indigenous people taking action need to be careful too.”

 

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
> Ladies and Gentlemen, > > On a very serious note and regarding the "Idle No More" movement, I > offer the following: > > Over the years we have all listened and watched as successive Canadian > governments have tried to deal with the residue of our colonial past. > On the evidence, a wide range of policies and a huge amount of our > money has failed to solve a seemingly insolvable problem of abortive > aboriginal treaties, perceived entitlements, and social disasters. > Many good people on both sides of the fence have spent lives of > frustration using different administrative models to no lasting > effect. > > The only consistent result of over 100 years of wasted time, money and > lives is the fact that for many, being a treaty aboriginal has become > a business in and of itself; Aboriginal Incorporated has become a way > of life, a leadership management philosophy, a negotiating tool, a > public spectacle, and a very lucrative business model, at least for a > few. The latest public display of Chief Spence and her Aboriginal > Inc. handlers has backfired and, with the release of the audit report > on her financial management of millions of tax dollars, we see what > really is the issue: The criminal misappropriation of funds intended > to help the social ills of an important but socially failing segment > of the Canadian population. > > This has to stop. The definition of insanity is doing the same > thing over, and over, while expecting a different result. A failed > policy approach is a failed policy approach and over 100 years should > be sufficient evidence that enough is enough. We need to start from > first principles: > > 1) No one in Canada is above the law of the land > 2) Your economic well-being is your responsibility. It is not the > government's job to pay you to fish and hunt. > 3) Employment rules apply to everyone. If you can't get a job where > you live: Move. Idle No More at your own expense! > 4) If you receive public funds; you are accountable. Penalties apply. > 5) Theft is theft; see 1) above. > 6) If the funds are badly spent or the recipients do not care for the > infrastructure and benefits provided; the funds will not be replaced. > 7) Treaties will be respected in the context of the date of the treaty > and the standards of the day. > 8) Your administrative costs and the pay of your local leadership will > be set by the people that fund your operation. > 9) As our municipalities are governed by provincial rules; so the > reserves will be governed by federal rules. > > I believe this list is a good start but is clearly a work in progress. > I further believe that a valid counter to the Idle No More movement > needs to be a strong 'Enough Is Enough' movement. Plainly said: We > have had enough! > > I truly hope the government gets the picture and puts its foot down > once and for all. > > If enough Canadians repeat this message then perhaps the abusive power > of Aboriginal Inc. will be lessened and the real needs of the > thousands of aboriginal Canadians in need can be met. > > Enough Is Enough! Author Unknown

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
I'm a 4th generation Canadian in Western CanadaI I live in Alberta. I only want to say that I think Chief Theresa Spence has been the worst thing that has happened to credibility of your movement. Around here it's that crook Thersa Spences movement

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
This comment by "author unknown" could be applied, with some changes, to so many groups and individuals, such as corporations, elected officials, (other) wealthy people (who think they have made it on their own), etc. The aiming of it at oppressed groups, and the attacks on such groups by pointing out real or imagined imperfections in those groups, and the stating of these "first principles" as if they are the TRUTH and not part of some Ann Rand philosophy seems a less than helpful contribution to the situation... Clark Goslee USA

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
Submitted by Anonymous on
Funny one on this part. Treaties will be respected in the context of the date of the treaty and the standards of the day. And they say they are not racist over there Riiiiight.
4

Read more