Wait!!!??? Is Craven going to appeal this further?? I red the opinion. It said that she offered “no persuasive evidence to support her claims”. It also said that Craven “ingored the history of this hard-fought litigation and the obstacles to producing an historical accounting.” what is there left to appeal? You lost kimberly. No w you want to change a 20 year old law?? If this was such a BIG DEAL t you, why did you not appeal the fractionation stuff? Or mention it during the ffairness hearing? Better yet, why not get the tribal trust cases to deal with the fractionation problem – aren’t the tribes getting the land??? It’s not the individuals! People are dying Kim. Do the right thing and let this go so we can get paid. Darnell W.