Fraud as a crime or fraud as a tort both require intent. And both require a benefit, something alleged but not named. I've heard she got a job on account of being Indian, something I doubt given Harvard's record, and the chair of the committee denied it. I've heard she got a loan that was specifically for minorities, but I don't know what that was about. She's certainly a minority in one sense: a woman tenured in securities regs. I would like to understand what benefit she got from repeating her family story so I could know whether to be angry rather than just amused. I'm perfectly willing to accept this information if somebody would just offer it.
Friday, June 22, 2012 - 21:42