This ‘ploy’ is much like a pig with lipstick. The lipstick is for looks and attractiveness, but it is still a pig nonetheless, rolling in the mud (my apologies to all pigs in describing a politician). If Elizabeth Warren would have proudly stood up and took responsibility for her calling on her ‘heritage’, then there wouldn’t be questions in her creditability. NOW, I would be interested in knowing more than just her words as she apparently speaks with a tongue like a fork in the road. The questions on her ‘heritage claims’ are no different than if a politician publicly claimed to have ‘black’, or ‘chinese’, or ‘spanish’, etc. blood while running for public office. Al Sharpton would want to know. Asian groups would want to know. Latino or La Raza groups would want answers. Heck even special interests groups as the gay lifestylers would want answers to their questions! For Warren supporters to state to ignore her claims and statements or put attention on her record is simply giving an excuse or rationale. If Elizabeth Warren is using her ‘heritage’ to justify winning an election based on the populace feeling sorry for American Indians – then this only further insinuates stereotypes based on racial segregation that supposedly the Democratic Party doctrines are against. As it is stands, Elizabeth Warren has NO CREDIBILITYissue to her public policies. Which only begs the question WHO IS Elizabeth Warren?