Could they have..AGAIN.. purposely misrepresented the facts to sustain a Eurocentric point of view? It's the 21st century and the U.S. seem to consider the statement " inferior character of native cultures", as true,in justifications for post/pre Christians possessions of indigenous lands. Thank you for examining the facts and clarifying this case for a layperson like me :) ... in defending Indian rights. This case arguments have misrepresented the facts to the court in order to obtain a ruling from the beginning. It's a shame that people, they believe are inferior are spelling it out to them. I feel that their mind set is "profit", and for native people is to accomplish. The journey of natives in this country continues, be brave, endure.. soon the bright light of the great mystery will soon enlighten us and show us a new path of brighter accomplishments!!!
Saturday, May 4, 2013 - 15:35