Well, first Ms/Mr Anonymous, the right to bear arms, otherwise known as the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution has NOTHING to do with Hunting. I think Mr. Russell would agree to that one. Second, I am not totally against background checks, as I have filled out many of them in firearms purchases. Even at gun shows. My problem is if they are going to try to control private sales, they want to create a database to see who owns what. That I am against. I trust Bloomberg and Brady as far as I can throw my house. If they had their way, they would ban all personal ownership. By the way, what are we trying to accomplish? Would the proposed background checks stopped Aurora or Sandy Hook? How many gun laws are on the books right now? Do they keep guns out of criminals hands? I have real mixed feelings about the 'Mental Health' to stop who can own firearms? By who's opinion? I minored in Psych and I no I would not want to try to define that line? I think Anonymous is a bit off, does that mean he/she shouldn't get to hold sharp objects and definitely no pressure cookers! Because I am not sure what 90% your talking to, because 97.652% of those I am talking to think your on Crack?!
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 - 16:50