Header

Jefferson Keel’s Message of Political Assimilation

Steven Newcomb
2/22/13

On February 14, 2013, in Washington, D.C., Jefferson Keel (Chickasaw Nation) delivered his "State of the Indian Nations” address in his capacity as President of the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI). Although his talk was titled, “Securing Our Futures,” the theme woven into his speech seemed to be “Ensuring our Political Assimilation as Indian Nations.”

Let’s be clear. Jefferson Keel addressed his audience primarily from the viewpoint of the United States. In his opening, Keel addressed himself to “my fellow Americans,” and thereby gave the impression that Indian people are just one of many different kinds of “Americans.”  He then said “all our vibrant threads” as Indian people “are woven into the fabric of America.” The word America is, of course, short for “the United States of America.” So, it is evidently his view that Indian nations have been “woven” into the United States.

Keel also referred to “America’s tribal nations,” the “possessive tense” apostrophe-s on America thereby depicting the United States as holding what he calls “tribal nations” as possessions. That Keel gave his address from the viewpoint of the United States is also found in his wording indicating that almost 25 percent of “America’s” on-shore oil and gas resources are found on “tribal lands.” (emphasis added). This frames the resources of Indian nations as rightfully belonging to the United States.

Speaking of the late Senator Inouye, Mr. Keel said: “He knew that America was at her strongest when all of her governments worked together to advance our security and prosperity.” (emphasis added) This again uses the possessive tense to frame Indian nation governments as belonging to the United States of America (this includes Indian nation governments in the category “all her governments”).

When Keel said “that America was at her strongest” when “all her people were thriving,” he was thereby including Indian people in the category “all her people.” Just as the phrase “her house” indicates that the house belongs to “her,” in this instance, “her people” indicates that Indian people are included in the category “her people” who Keel considers to belong to the United States.

When he said that “a sovereign people are a strong people,” Keel’s larger context was the United States, rather than Indian nations. (Otherwise he would have stated “sovereign peoples are strong peoples” so as to acknowledge our own peoples and nations as politically distinct from the United States).

As a retired United States military officer, Mr. Keel’s background includes a lifetime spent in military service to the United States of America. His mind operates on that basis, which is fine for him personally. However, he has stepped far beyond his purview as the president of N.C.A.I when he delivers a speech in which he assumes that all Indian nations and peoples, and all Indian people share his personal military worldview. He has gone far beyond his purview when his language presumes that Indian nations already have been or are to be politically assimilated (from a metaphor of digestion) into the body politic of the United States. Or, as he put it: “To affirm our rightful, [U.S.] constitutional place in the American [United States of America’s] family of governments.”

As originally free and independent nations and peoples that predate by thousands of years the U.S. Constitution, it is important to remain mindful of the fact that it is the United States's Constitution. It is not our Constitution because we come from our own distinct nations that predate the United States, and which the U.S. has a track record of patiently and methodically attempting to dominate and destroy. Yet, by using the possessive tense “our,” Keel gives the false impression that his personal view of the U.S. Constitution is shared by all of Indian Country.

In the nineteenth century, the United States began its intensified efforts to assimilate Indian people into the society and “fabric” of the United States. That agenda is still in motion. This is why we ought to be on a guard against present day assumptions, such as we find in Mr. Keel’s speech, that an assimilative melding of Indian nations into the political “fabric” of the United States is an envisioned positive outcome that we all share.

Along these lines, Mr. Keel also said: “This is the task at hand, to move together toward a more perfect union.” What is a union? It is “the formation of a single political unit from two or more separate and independent units.” The idea of our originally free and independent Indian nations moving “together” on a path of political assimilation, toward a “single political unit” with the United States is not a path of self-determination. It is a path toward self-oblivion.

Steven Newcomb (Shawnee, Lenape) is co-founder and co-director of the Indigenous Law Institute, author of Pagans in the Promised Land: Decoding the Doctrine of Christian Discovery (Fulcrum, 2008), and the Indigenous and Kumeyaay Research Coordinator for the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

16

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Anonymous's picture
Steve does an outstanding job of articulating the facts and making sure you do not get lost in the noise or the rhetoric. Worth reading twice. Andre Leonard,
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
The National Congress of American Indians is a union of tribal governments that was created to secure concensus among its member tribes and to present that concensus to the public, the US Congress, Executive and, at times, the judiciary. The member tribes of the organization join of their own volition and are authorized by their respective tribal govements to join the organization and pay its dues. The President of NCAI does not speak for Indian Country nor does he or she pretend to. His address and his statements are expression of that concensus, and his own voice as one who has gained his position by a democratic process among the members of the organization. So, Professor Nuke em, cheer up, put a smile on that sour puss glaring out of your picture box.
Anonymous
rezzdog's picture
Well, you are kind of correct. However, NCAI consistently hints that they speak for all of Indian country. Keel, always says, Indian country needs this or that, not NCAI members need this or that. Of the 560+ plus federal tribes in the U.S. and dozens of non federal tribes, NCAI has a membership of maybe 200 tribes, far less than half of all nations in the U.S. Yet they say "Founded in 1944, the National Congress of American Indians is the oldest, largest and most representative American Indian and Alaska Native organization in the country. " Anyone not knowing Indian country would walk away from the statement believing that NCAI is the representative native organization of record. But, we all know that they are not.
rezzdog
Anonymous's picture
All American Indians/Alaskan Natives live on 'reservations', held for them by the United States Government. Attempts at moving away from this fact have not even begun. No matter what you call your reservation: nation, community, reserve, etc. In many ways, all of us have assimilated. If you are educated, have material possessions, pay for a home, etc., you are part of the fabric of the United States of America. We that said, many still remain, or try to remain in some traditional state of their respective tribe. If its just a pow wow, or a mind-set. We hold on. Ido not know of one single "traditional" indian on the entire Navajo 'Nation'. What I have met and know, are Navajos who practice the Holy People's way and live in the euro-american world. Its nonsense to point fingers at who's more traditional, etc. That's the mind set that the US government is using to keep all of us, in America, in control. Look how the elephants and donkeys act in Washington, divided we are failing. Yes, I agree, Mr Keel said some strange things, but lets not tear up his words and try to bring him down. He has after all a good heart or he would not be where he is at. Blessings. The speech also goes against the actual "mission" of the NCAI.
Anonymous
rezzdog's picture
This is not about Keel, it is about NCAI. Keel certainly did not think up or write his statements. This about NCAI running away with the Native agenda without any consensus at all with those most affected. Your perception of what Newcomb is saying is wrong.
rezzdog
Anonymous's picture
BLah, blah, blah, blah and blah blah
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
I'm Cherokee, grew up thinking of myself that way, want to claim Cherokee citizenship & denounce my US membership.
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
Well stated! not every Native wants to get lost in the big melting pot of assimilation.
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
Excellent critique Steve Newcomb! Sounds very familiar in Canada with the elected AFN leadership.
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
Rezzdog: As you probably have guessed, this is Chuck Trimble and I wrote the comment justifying NCAI, an organization I will continue to defend, although I know they sometime (perhaps often, depending who is running the place in DC) say and do wrong or unwise things. They do seek concensus of tribal governments, and they do present them as resolutions, debated and enacted by a majority of their members. The are indeed the oldest and larges national intertribal organization in the United States. And NCAI is the ONLY organization that has been created by Indian people officially representing tribal governments. Perhaps they are assimilationist in calling for improvements in economic, education, technology and health in reservation and Indian community life, and defending Native peoples' rights to practice traditional religious activities; and they are honest about it -- up front, in writing, and consistent over many years. I don't know what you mean that they "hint" at representing all Native peoples, but that is your perception. I don't think they are dishonest in not saying "NCAI represents on assimilated Indians, and speaks only for them." They represent tribal governments as we all understand those governments to be, whether or not we agree that those government should continue or be terminated. I'm not aware of what a non-assimilated Indian organization would be, and have always asked the promoters of decolonization (or more accurately, perhaps, decolonialization) and anti-assimilationism what they perceive their goals to be. What is the utopian state they seek? Describe it, and maybe many more people will opt out of the present social structures they find themselves in, and join with them in their efforts. BTW, I did not mean this or my previous post to be anonymous.
Anonymous

Pages