AP images
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Montana), chairman of the Senate of the Committee on Indian Affairs

Tester Introduces Clean Carcieri Fix

Rob Capriccioso

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Montana), chairman of the Senate of the Committee on Indian Affairs (SCIA) since mid-February, has introduced a pro-tribal legislative solution to the controversial 2009 Supreme Court Carcieri v. Salazar decision that limited the Department of the Interior’s ability to take land into trust for tribes not under federal jurisdiction in 1934.

Tester’s bill, introduced April 1, reaffirms the Secretary of the Interior’s authority to take land into trust for all tribes, regardless of when they were recognized by the federal government. His legislation does not exclude any tribes on issues like off-reservation gaming or location, as past unsuccessful Carcieri legislation considered in the Senate has done.

“I know that there are a number of my colleagues who have an interest in this legislation and would like to see changes to this bill,” Tester said on the Senate floor upon his introduction. “I want to let you know that I stand ready to work with each of you to craft a bill that the Senate can enact and that will end this problem of two classes of tribes forever.”

Tester sought to introduce a clean fix quickly into his tenure leading SCIA, Senate aides said, because he believes this is an issue that is causing economic uncertainty and costly litigation for many tribes, as well as for the U.S. government.

“This decision has had a significant impact on tribes in every part of this country, whether it is the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, which is facing spurious litigation over its status as a tribe; the Samish Tribe of Washington, which has been waiting four years for a Carcieri determination; or the Little Shell Tribe of my home State of Montana, who could be affected by this ruling if they are granted federal recognition, as they should be,” Tester said in his introduction of the bill. “Moreover, the Carcieri decision has spawned more harmful litigation, including Salazar v. Patchak, where the Supreme Court ruled that individuals have six years to challenge a tribe's trust land acquisition, and Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California, where the Ninth Circuit essentially ruled that there is no time limit on challenging a tribe's status or its trust land acquisitions.”

Tester noted at a March 12 gathering of the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) in Washington, D.C that problems for tribes stemming from Carcieri have been ongoing for five years and counting.

“While I believe a clean fix is a solution, many of my colleagues in the Senate don’t agree,” Tester cautioned at NCAI. “Even Indian country is divided on the issue. I can tell you that I plan to introduce a clean fix, but it must come with the support and pledge of Indian country to come together on this issue and engage in meaningful dialogue.

“At the end of the day, we need the votes to pass the legislation,” Tester added. “When we look at the map of the nation, we need to know where we stand on the issue. And when we look at the Senate, we need to know how we reach sixty votes. So let’s be realistic. We will not receive the full support of my Democratic colleagues, so the question becomes how we bargain with Republican leaders to make meaningful inroads to solve this issue.”

Randy Noka, a councilman and ambassador with the Narragansett Indian Tribe, told Tester at the NCAI meeting that while Indian country may not be 100 percent supportive of a clean fix, he believes there is overwhelming tribal support for one. He noted at the time that over 30 Native organizations that represent hundreds of Indian tribes had signed letters of support for a clean fix.

“Maybe not 566 federally acknowledged tribes, but overwhelmingly, senator, we support a clean Carcieri fix,” Noka told Tester. “We are ready to stand side-by-side with you, senator. Whatever we have to do as tribal leaders, let’s take that challenge.”


You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page



Two Bears Growling's picture
Two Bears Growling
Submitted by Two Bears Growling on
Mark Begich is not a senator from Arkansas. He is from Alaska.

editors's picture
Submitted by editors on
@Two Bears Growling: Thank you for your comment, the story has been updated.