The NFL Perpetuates Stereotypes That Fuel Racism, Domestic Abuse

Jacqueline Keeler

Last Sunday, I stood in downtown Phoenix with 100 other Native American protestors chanting “No More Victims, No More Stereotypes” and praying for Indigenous women—our sisters—who have fallen to domestic violence, rape, and murder. Around us blared party music and across the street a giant inflatable Bud Light party tent beckoned to the hundreds of thousands Super Bowl fans that had descended upon the city of Phoenix. Somewhere in “the valley” at the ESPN Super Bowl headquarters, or the Glendale stadium, or in one the glittering buildings near us, was the NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Our prayers were for our hurting and departed mothers, daughters, and sisters but our message was for him.

"There is definitely a connection between violence against women and the NFL. I've experienced it myself, " said Navajo psychiatric social worker Amanda Blackhorse, the lead plaintiff in the successful case against the Washington NFL team’s trademark.

She was referring to the hate mail and comments she’s received for standing up on the mascot issue, which she recently recounted in Indian Country Today Media Network: Blackhorse: The Hate Mail I Receive is Hostile, Aggressive, Racist and Sexist.

Amanda Blackhorse. Photo by Jacqueline Keeler.

At the protest, I took a photo of her with her daughter at her feet writing in chalk on the sidewalk “I am Not Your Mascot” surrounded by Native protestors of all ages who covered the sidewalk with similar sentiments. I was there to support my friend, Nicholet Deschine Parkhurst, a doctoral student at Arizona State University who organized both the vigil and the protest, attended by many other protestors from all over the West Coast and Canada.

At a vigil held in Phoenix’s Civic Space Park the night before, mere blocks from the giant Super Bowl party, a small assembly of Native American advocates and survivors of domestic abuse had held tea lights in the shadows below the park’s giant lighted sculpture that someone described as “a giant electronic dream catcher.” Many of those who spoke echoed a meme that our organization, Eradicating Offensive Native Mascotry, put out on social media that said, “To our Native sisters who are missing or murdered or victims of violence or rape or feeling disrespected or hopeless…No More. You are not forgotten. You are loved.” Protestors held up signs spelling out “No More,” the NFL’s domestic violence campaign hashtag.

Some of the assaults on Native women are due to jurisdictional gaps on reservations. Our tribes cannot prosecute non-federally enrolled people. This limitation on our jurisdiction is a result of racial stereotypes held by U.S. elected officials who believe Natives cannot be trusted with jurisdiction. Some of these gaps were addressed by the passage of the Violence Against Women Act in 2013. But the desire to exploit these gaps and go “hunting” for Native women to abuse and murder is clearly tied to lingering stereotypes held about Native American women which permeate American culture.

Native women have the highest rates of domestic violence in the country, bar none. According to the Department of Justice, one in three Native women will experience rape, and Native women have 2.5 times the sexual assault rate and three times the murder rate of all other American women. In some counties, the murder rate for Native women is ten times the national average. These assaults are committed 78 percent of the time by white men. Native women are the only group more likely to be victimized by someone not of their race. As I said in the Think Progress article about the protest, “How white men view us matters.”

Most Americans have little contact with Native people outside of the stereotypes that the Washington team promotes through its Redskins mascot. The flip side of the “warrior” stereotype includes “Indian princess” and the “squaw” stereotypes displayed by female fans who dress up in “Pocahottie” outfits. They don our regalia, even faux eagle feather headdresses reserved for our leaders, to make themselves more sexually alluring to drunk male fans.

Commissioner Goodell was quoted in August saying, “The public response reinforced my belief that the NFL is held to a higher standard, and properly so. Much of the criticism stemmed from a fundamental recognition that the NFL is a leader, that we do stand for important values, and that we can project those values in ways that have a positive impact beyond professional football. We embrace this role and the responsibility that comes with it. We will listen openly, engage our critics constructively, and seek continuous improvement in everything we do. We will use this opportunity to create a positive outcome by promoting policies of respect for women both within and outside of the workplace. We will work with nationally recognized experts to ensure that the NFL has a model policy on domestic violence and sexual assault. We will invest time and resources in training, programs and services that will become part of our culture. And we will increase the sanctions imposed on NFL personnel who violate our policies.”

And yet, despite these strong words concerning domestic violence and the release of the NFL’s anti-DV ad during the Super Bowl, Goodell refuses to see the connection between Washington Redsk*ns and the promotion of stereotypes about Native people by the $2.2 billion franchise. The NFL promotes its “No More” campaign against domestic violence, yet does not address how stereotypes promoted by their fans in redface and Pocahottie outfits affect how our fellow Americans view us. So, here we were on Super Bowl Sunday protesting and handing out flyers to Super Bowl fans explaining our hashtag #StereotypesNoMore.

Leanne Guy, executive director of the Southwest Indigenous Women’s Coalition, an event co-sponsor, said in her presentation at an ASU panel on “Masking Stereotypes with False Honor: Race, Sports and Violence Against Indigenous Women”:

“In order to understand why there is violence against our women and why the rates are so high,

we need to make the connection of actions that led to the marginalization of our Indian nations, and specifically our women, that perpetrate the belief, the myth that we are not real, that we are objects of possession … that we are rapeable, beatable, and can be discarded.”

The motif of the “dirty Indian” can also be seen in how the word “redskin” was used by white Americans, as seen in an 1885 ad for Ivory Soap that perceived the “dirtiness” of Native people:

We were once factious, fierce and wild,

In peaceful arts unreconciled

Our blankets smeared with grease and stains

From buffalo meat and settlers' veins.

Through summer's dust and heat content

From moon to moon unwashed we went,

But IVORY SOAP came like a ray

Of light across our darkened way

More examples of this depiction of Native people can be seen in the examples submitted in the U.S. Trademark case that led to the cancellation of six trademarks the Washington NFL team has on the word “Redskins” including the “Redskinettes,” the teams cheerleading squad that originally dressed in redface and wore fake black braids and skimpy “squaw” outfits.

The NFL’s continued merchandising of a term that explicitly describes attacks on Native people through the sale of our ancestors’ body parts for bounty (called “redskins”) and the slaughter of Native men, women and children for trophies cannot be divorced from the historical stereotypes that are central to America’s conception of Native people. These racist images have been encoded in Native mascotry for 250 years and are still promoted today not only by the NFL but by nearly 2,000 high schools across the United States.

Andrea Smith, in her book Conquest, said, “When a Native woman suffers abuse, this abuse is an attack on her identity as a woman and an attack on her identity as Native. The issues of colonization, race, and gender oppression cannot be separated. This fact explains why in my experience as a rape crisis counselor, every Native survivor I ever counseled said to me at one point, ‘I wish I was no longer Indian.’

Ollin Kin, a young man who had traveled with AIM Orange County to attend the vigil said, “We deserve to be protected, we deserve to be respected." Another speaker said, "Every Indigenous person who has spoken represents thousands of women who are not here. We need to be louder than the Super Bowl."

We have a petition at RH Reality Check demanding that Goodell “truly show your commitment to stopping domestic violence by retiring the use of the ethnic slur ‘RedskIns’ and supporting Native women’s domestic violence programs.” At the writing of this article we have 9,301 signers. Please add your name. After you sign you will be asked to donate to one of three Native American women’s organizations helping Native women who have been victims of domestic violence.

Let’s show Dan Snyder, owner of the Washington Redsk*ns, that we can help our own without being subjected to stereotyping on national television every week. We will be presenting the petition with all the signatures to NFL commissioner Goodell in person with a printout more than 90 pages long. I hope he hears us.

Jacqueline Keeler is a Twitter activist (@jfkeeler) and one of the founders of Eradicating Offensive Native Mascotry.

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page




tmsyr11's picture
Again!….with the half-truths, and half-measures! Once more, efforts on the part of Racial Agitators-Instigators only the cloud the legitimate issue of domestic violence. Domestic violence and those against women existed long before ENOM came along. By trying to 'blend' violence today with the Washington Redskins only side-tracks the SERIOUS true efforts to combat violence not just against Indians, but against all peoples. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Michael Madrid's picture
(from the article): " Commissioner Goodell was quoted in August saying, “The public response reinforced my belief that the NFL is held to a higher standard, and properly so. Much of the criticism stemmed from a fundamental recognition that the NFL is a leader, that we do stand for important values, and that we can project those values in ways that have a positive impact beyond professional football. We embrace this role and the responsibility that comes with it. We will listen openly, engage our critics constructively, and seek continuous improvement in everything we do." _____________________________________________________________- Hmmm, White man continue to speak with forked tongue. ________________________________________________________________ (TO tmsyr11): You STILL can't see the connection between racist sports mascots and substance and spouse abuse, can you? Get your head out of Dan Snyder's ass and read these: Professor affirms effects of Indian mascots Jack Rooney | Tuesday, March 25, 2014 Stephanie Fryberg, a visiting professor of psychology at the University of Washington, presented her research Tuesday on the psychological effects of American Indian sports mascots, which affirmed these types of social representations depress the self-esteem of American Indian students. http://ndsmcobserver.com/2014/03/professor-affirms-effects-indian-mascots/ ________________________________________________________________ Respect the Person, Not the Logo: The Psychological Effects of Racist Symbols in Sports By Tom Schreier | August 14, 2014 Dr. Harvey Gunderson, President of the Religious Americans Against ‘Indian’ Nicknames & Logos (RAAINL) claims that the use of Native American mascots is psychologically harmful to American Indians. Citing the research of University of Arizona professor Dr. Stephanie Ann Fryberg, Dr. Gunderson states that American Indians experience lower self-esteem upon exposure to race-based sports nicknames, logos, and mascots. In addition to reduced self-esteem, Dr. Gunderson claims that Native Americans are victims of “identity theft.” He has found that in communities where the high school uses a nickname like the “Indians,” non-native students will take pride in being an “Indian” just like their father and their grandfather. It is as though they become part of the Native American community by going to a school with an American Indian mascot. To put it in perspective, imagine how upset African American students would be if their peers put on black makeup and chanted “Let’s go Blacks! Let’s go Blacks!” at the school’s home games. Envision a Caucasian student telling their peers that they are proud to be a “Black,” just like their parents who attended the school years before them. http://www.article-3.com/respect-the-person-the-psychological-effects-of-racist-symbols-in-sports-914475 _______________________________________________________________ The Harmful Psychological Effects of Washington’s Redskins Mascot The problem with this flippant line of reasoning, though, is that this is not just an issue of political correctness. Promoting such an epithet with millions of marketing dollars creates very real mental health consequences—and not just for the indigenous populations the word denigrates. Not only does the use of this slur risk causing direct damage to the mental and physical health of our country's Native American population, it also puts us all at risk for both participating in and being harmed by ongoing prejudice. Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/27/harmful-psychological-effects-washingtons-redskins-mascot
Michael Madrid
tmsyr11's picture
The below is worth repeating again, and again, again. The bottom line is issues faced in Indian country have existed long before Keeler, modern-day PHDs, Blackhorse, **********, Synder, Washington Redskins, NFL. Half-truths, half-measures followed by twisted justifications do not amount to gaining 'support' from Indian country. The 'players' to the mascot theme are quite obvious. Flying to sporting events to 'protest' isn't cheap; the cost of flights is more expensive than ever. I don't get paid to 'protest'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, I cannot see the connection between the Good Dr's medical 'opinion' on the Washington Redskin name and the problems that exist today on indian reservations, especially the poorer, Western Indian tribes, i.e. Navajo Tribe. I located various web-links & articles about the problems and issues and changes faced by Indian tribes. I'm no expert but just a realist and for all practical, sensible purposes, I can't accept the Redskins are in anyway contributing to these problems. In fact, blaming the Washington Redskins name or making Dan Snyder the "bad White-guy" seems….well desperate. I am not even sure if the links will be allowed on the ICTMN, but there are at least 14 links (below) highlighting issues as sexual abuse, alcoholism, diabetes, substance addiction, domestic violence, jails and isolations, etc. (NOTE: but on a side note, Indian Casino revenues are flourishing and obviously going somewhere else). I don't have to look far beyond my tribal relations to witness this happening either. http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoppisch/2011/12/1... http://www.spotlightonpoverty.org/ExclusiveComment... http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagenam... http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/us/on-indian-res... http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/america-t... http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/south-dakotas-... http://www.ibtimes.com/native-americans-tragedy-al... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-tavare/suicide-a... http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/10... http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/09/us/09suicide.htm... http://nativetimes.com/news/federal/3297-us-senate... http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-secur... http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/prog... http://www.fronterasdesk.org/content/native-americ... Read more at https://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/09/10/we-are-not-victims-quechan-people-suicide-and-redskins-156838