Courtesy the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
Robert Soto, of the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas, received his confiscated eagle feathers back on March 10, 2015, a day shy of the nine-year anniversary of their seizure by the U.S. government.

U.S. Returns Eagle Feathers to Lipan Apache Religious Leader After Court Fight


Nine years almost to the day after his eagle feathers were seized at a powwow, Robert Soto has gotten them back.

On Tuesday March 10 the U.S. government returned the 42 eagle feathers it had seized from the religious leader and feather dancer of the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas on March 11, 2006. The return flowed out of a legal decision last August in which the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the seizure had violated Soto’s rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

RELATED: The Eagle Feather Law and State-Recognized Tribes

Soto, as part of a tribe that is recognized by the state of Texas but not by the federal government, was accused of unlawful possession of feathers from the endangered birds. Only federally recognized tribes are eligible to receive permits to possess eagle feathers. Feathers are obtained through the National Eagle Repository, the sole legally sanctioned source. Possession of eagle feathers and parts without a permit can bring a prison sentence and fines of as much as $250,000.

RELATED: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Streamlines National Eagle Repository Rules

“The government has about a million better things to do with taxpayer money than send undercover agents to raid Native American powwows and confiscate their eagle feathers,” said Luke Goodrich, Deputy General Counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, in a statement.

RELATED: Stokes: Time for New Eagle Feather Law

In 2006, federal agents infiltrated and interrupted a powwow to confiscate the feathers from Soto as he participated in full regalia.

The court victory was only partial, said the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which describes itself as a “non-profit, public-interest legal and educational institute with a mission to protect the free expression of all faiths” on its website. While Soto and his tribe were deemed eligible to possess the feathers, federal law still prohibits them from using the items in religious ceremonies, leaving open the possibility of prosecution on other fronts, the Becket Fund said.

The Religious Freedom of Restoration Act notoriously served last July as the basis for a U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of the Hobby Lobby craft store in its bid to opt out of covering contraception because of its owners’ belief that conception begins at birth—a case that the Becket Fund also defended.

RELATED: Supreme Court Used Indian Law to Prevent Birth Control for Women

Goodrich implied there was hypocrisy in the U.S. government’s tacit permission for eagles to be killed for a host of reasons, while drawing the line at mere possession for American Indians.

“The government allows hundreds of eagles, if not thousands, to be killed every year for non-religious reasons. Yet it won't allow these Native Americans to possess even a single feather,” said Goodrich. "It's time to let Native Americans practice their faith; we're not living in the 1800s anymore."

Robert Soto, Linan Apache of Texas, blesses his recently returned eagle feathers. (Photo: Courtesy the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty)

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page



Chooj's picture
Submitted by Chooj on
"While Soto and his tribe were deemed eligible to possess the feathers, federal law still prohibits them from using the items in religious ceremonies..." So, the Federal government says it's okay to have them but don't dare use them in ceremony?!?! That's just f-f-f--screwed up!

nonfedindian's picture
Submitted by nonfedindian on
Everything I have read about this individual tells me he is a proud Native American and I am glad he had his feathers returned. But what happens when the New Age Wannabes (that we all know exist) start screaming for their right to possess feathers? Even limiting to state-recognized tribes can be a problem because there are some bogus such tribes out there.