Sue Ogrocki/Associated Press
Pieces of the Keystone XL pipeline in Oklahoma, where part of the project is being built.

Obama Rejects Keystone XL: 'Does Not Serve National Interest'

ICTMN Staff
11/6/15

President Barack Obama has rejected outright the Keystone XL oil pipeline proposal, just ahead of global climate talks in Paris and less than a week after TransCanada Corp. asked for the government to halt its review of the controversial project.

RELATED: Keystone XL: Indigenous Opponents Call for Rejection Despite TransCanada Halt Request

“This morning, Secretary [of State] John Kerry informed me that after extensive public outreach, in consultation with other cabinet agencies, the State Department has decided that the Keystone XL pipeline would not serve the national interests of the United States,” Obama said in an announcement to reporters at the White House. “I agree with that decision.”

“The pipeline would not make a meaningful longterm contribution to our economy,’’ Mr. Obama said, speaking from the White House, according to video posted at The New York Times.

“Second, the pipeline would not lower gas prices for American consumers,” he said, reflecting results of various studies that had demonstrated just that.

RELATED: NRDC Report: Keystone XL Pipeline Will Lower US Gas Prices a Myth

Further, “shipping dirtier crude oil into our country would not increase America’s energy security.” What has increased America’s energy security is to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels from unstable parts of the world.”

Although TransCanada and others in the oil industry had touted the project’s job-creation potential, studies had shown that it would not in fact create many jobs.

RELATED: The Truth Hurts? Obama's Stark Jobs Estimate for Keystone XL Pipeline

The 1,700-mile-long, $8 billion pipeline would have brought 800,000 barrels per day of bituminous crude from the oil sands of Alberta, Canada to the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, in Texas. The project was under review by the U.S. Department of State because it would cross the border between the two countries.

Studies showed the project would have contributed to global warming by increasing the capacity of the oil sands, adding even more carbon to the atmosphere—something Obama had said would cause him to reject the proposal.

RELATED: Obama: No Keystone XL if It Increases Carbon Emissions

Keystone XL Carbon Emissions Could Run Four Times Higher Than Current Estimates: Study

Environmentalists and other opponents called the move a victory for Earth’s—which is to say, everyone’s—land and water.

“We stood our ground, and today President Obama stood with us, the pipeline fighters,” said Jane Kleeb, director of Bold Nebraska, where the pipeline’s route is mired in legal challenges. “Tonight landowners can finally go to sleep knowing their family is safe and sound. Our unlikely alliance showed America that hard work and scientific facts can beat Big Oil’s threat to our land and water.”

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

POST A COMMENT

Comments

WinterWindTeacher's picture
WinterWindTeacher
Submitted by WinterWindTeacher on
It is a blessed joy to put a collective 'unlikely alliance' bold and united rejection of the criminal enterprise of destroying the land in Alberta, murder and calling it energy. I am thankful and grateful for all the 'stand your ground' people who dedicated themselves to undo the undoing. I have something to keep the adventure capitalist's busy for a long time; a criminal trial for even digging into the earth at Alberta. It is an ugly mess they have made. The ancient tree's they cut down helped to regulate the earths temperature and I am not sure but perhaps on the migratory path of the caribou; life was using and needing what they have been destroying. I think a court should fine the investor thieves for this great heist and start repairing the land where they have been digging it out and start filling it in with compost and clean soils so that the migration route of animals is safe and in another 20 or 30 thousand years maybe a mature arboreal forest will return. There are poor people who are getting tagged for the governments rip off of having to pay fines for every rinky dink thing to provide a viable source of operating income for the government while real crooks are being chauffeured around on tax payer expense and offered sites where they can bash it to pieces. I find it hard - and I would as a judge ponder - what legal rights does the post colonial governments squatting on occupied lands have? The usual method is a warrant for their arrest and forced removal.
1