Header

On the Washington Post Redskins Poll

C. Richard King
5/24/16

For many, the key take away of the recent survey conducted by the Washington Post is that the vast majority of American Indians do not take offense at the name of the local professional football team. In fact, for some, the poll sounds a death knell for the movement against the slur at the heart of the franchise and has even convinced at least one vocal opponent on staff at the Post to rethink his position. To my mind, all of these readings miss the mark. Most importantly, they miss the harms it excuses and perpetuates.

While heralded as new, the poll actually repeats in content and execution previous surveys, making many of the same errors in how it approached the issue, asked questions, and selected participants. In common, with several other similar surveys over the past two decades, it works to minimize and misconstrue anti-Indian racism and its histories, reducing them to personal feelings. It limits itself to offensiveness, the conscious reaction of an individual, turning attention away from the established impacts of stereotypes and slurs. Social scientists have demonstrated that American Indian mascots and monikers harm Native Americans. Exposure to them increases psychological distress among American Indians, lowering their self-regard, depressing their sense of community worth, and negatively impacting their assessment of future possibilities. Recognizing “the catastrophic effects of prejudice” associated with Native American mascots, in 2005, the American Psychological Association issued a position paper denouncing them. More than a decade later, the Washington Post continues to make excuses for the team and the anti-Indian racism anchoring it.

Perhaps more troubling, the most recent survey underscores that the paper actually shares much in common with the local NFL franchise. Let me briefly clarify.

First, both display a pronounced entitlement to Indianans. Like, most Americans, both seem to take for granted a kind of ownership of things Indian—symbols, images, opinion—and the capacity to impart their true significance. Had the Post worked in pollsters, consultants, and scholars in Indian Country, one imagines the approach and findings would have different.

Second, the franchise and the Post seem to only want American Indians when they serve their ends. The former has found it increasingly convenient to point to its tenuous connections to Native Americans, while laboring hard to secure support (often through philanthropy) in indigenous communities. The latter, which could have used its resources to take up any of a number of issues and solicit indigenous opinion about them, opted instead to restate a familiar refrain based on a flawed survey. In fact, it seems both have little patience for critical work in Indian Country. The Post’s failure to discuss the work of Adrienne Keene (Cherokee), a post-doctoral fellow at Brown University, who has compiled an archive of nearly 6,000 Native Americans against the slur, and James Fenelon (Dakota/Lakota), Director of the Center for Indigenous Peoples Studies at California State University, San Bernardino, who found in small study that the majority of tribally enrolled American Indians opposed the moniker, is especially noteworthy in this regard.

Third, both profit on a public ignorant of American Indian peoples and policies, actively trading on the misrecognition of Native Americans. From its inception, relying on an appetite for imagined Indians, shaped by centuries of displacement and violence, the franchise played off misconceptions and stereotypes to create a successful brand. Similarly, the most recent survey misconstrues Indians and Indianness. Less than half of the participants identified as tribal citizens, meaning, in the words of the Native American Journalist Association, “more than half of those interviewed were likely not Native American.” Consequentially, its findings only represent the opinion of American Indians by distorting who and what an American Indian is. Furthermore, to do so, it trivializes the political standings of tribes and tribal members, dismissing the import of citizenship, nationhood, and sovereignty. Misrecognition by the Post, in turn, encourages a misrepresentation of the issue, a trivialization of the long-standing and increasingly visible opposition to the team, and the invasive claims of non-natives to place, culture, and identity.

In the end, the team and the paper dehumanize indigenous people. Where the NFL franchise uses slurs and stereotypes, the Post encourages misrecognition and misunderstanding. In distinct ways, both institutions continue the vanishing of Americans Indians.

The recent survey by the Washington Post is a big deal. It affirms the pervasiveness of anti-Indian racism today. As such, it should remind us that the racial slur and the sport brand built around it are only the beginning of a much larger and more enduring struggle.

C. Richard King is a professor of comparative ethnic studies at Washington State University. He is the author or editor of more than a dozen books, including Team Spirits: The Native American Mascots Controversy (Nebraska, 2001) and Native Athletes in Sport and Society: A Reader (Nebraska, 2006).

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

4

POST A COMMENT

Comments

alexjacobs's picture
Well why not give them the Full Redskin Effect, and some Wagon Burning too, flaming arrows and Wounded Knee demonstrations, I saw those pitiful stand-around-the Fort "Indians" trotted out as examples. Every major USA city was once a Fort built on top of a trading center, that we eventually burned down, several times. Those pictured "Indians" are far removed from producing any kind of progeny that would be affected by this harmful BULLYING Propoganda...just keep protesting and lobbing flaming arrows...one day all that dry tinder crap is going to burn down and something new will spring up, like it always has.
alexjacobs
Sammy7's picture
Dan Snyder seems a pitiful caricature of a man. The false privileges of corporate ownership cannot mask his greed nor hatred of Indian Peoples. To him we are no more than a vehicle for profit. We need not stain ourselves by engaging him further in these times. He and those like him are engaging in a form of slow self immolation, just as American society is doing. As the rings of time turn so will the memory of Dan Snyder. I trust in the old wisdom of our ancestors and The Great Spirit. In right relationship.
Sammy7
silhouette's picture
Im wondering if you feel the same way about the 70's pop band REDBONE. A Native American band. Do you turn off your radio when their hit "Come and Get Your Love" is played? Or do you sing along? Did you take the time to bash the Washington Post when it has given time and circulation space to article after article in support of changing the REDSKIN name? Or do you prefer biased Media to support your so-called Unbiased stance while claiming you stand for freedom and equality? Are you about true equality and freedom of speech and press or only selectively choosing in support of your own opinion? Play REDBONE's song and think about it while singing along.
silhouette
silhouette's picture
Ask the Democratic Politicians behind this issue who stand tall like Superman fighting for justice, to cough up some money to back up their "Moral" stance and help Native Americans out of poverty, substance abuse, domestic violence, and suicide. They will, each one of them, smile and pat you on the back, and disappear. And you will never see or hear from them ever again. The same as it ever was.
silhouette