Header

Justice Scalia and the Racist Nature of Federal Indian Law

Steven Newcomb
6/6/14

A couple of years ago, US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was at a function that Congressman Tom Cole (R-OK) was also attending. Upon hearing that Congressman Cole is from the Chickasaw Nation, Scalia said: “Don't forget you belong to a conquered race.”

Justice Scalia’s use of the word “race” places his comment in an obvious racial frame of reference. The idea of American Indians being “conquered” evokes the theme of inferiority (those deemed “conquered”), and superiority (the racial group said to have conquered “the race” treated as “inferior”). In other words, Justice Scalia’s comment was predicated on the idea of racial domination: “We are the victorious race and you are the inferior, ‘conquered race.’” In short, Justice Scalia’s comment was an open expression of racism and is accurately re-expressed in this manner: “Don't forget you belong to a dominated race.”

The Ethnic Studies Department at the University of Oregon characterizes and studies racism as a system of domination. Racism is structured in terms of a top/down pattern of superiority and inferiority, of dominance and subordinance. One example of racism is automatically judging dark skinned people with “non-white” facial features as inferior to “white” people with a lighter skin hue and European features.

For a racist, darker skin and “non-white” racial features serve as “proof” of the inferiority of “black” people. A racist judgment of inferiority can also be based on some other categorization, such as some “group” identification. Simply being “other than white society,” and, therefore, “lower than” the supposedly superior “norm” of “white people” is enough to be judged by racists as “lesser than.”

Donald Sterling, owner of the Los Angeles Clippers basketball team has been embroiled in a firestorm of controversy over what has been characterized as his racist comments about “black people” to his “mixed-race” girlfriend. His comments were anonymously leaked to the media through the gossip monger program TMZ, and this has resulted in a condemnation of racism in the media. The universal attitude seems to be: “How dare Sterling talk in such a racist manner about African American National Basketball Association (NBA) basketball players.”

The consequences were swift: Sterling is probably going to be compelled to sell his Clippers franchise (which he will no doubt profit from). He has been banned for life from the NBA. He has been fined some $2.5 million dollars. This is likely to hurt Sterling a great deal since it will take such a huge chunk of his estimated net worth of some $1,900,000,000. After the fine, that leaves him with a mere $1,897,500,000 net worth. That kind of punishment will surely teach him a valuable lesson.

One white male pundit on CNN said he believes the outrage over, and universal repudiation of, Sterling’s comments, sends a clear signal that racism has pretty much ended in the United States. And it makes sense that in many ways African Americans in the United States have obviously come far since the days of separate bathrooms, drinking fountains, and back-row bus seats during the separate but equal days of the Jim Crow laws. However, for the most poverty stricken sectors of African American society, the daily problems they continue to face from institutional racism abound.

While privately expressed racism toward wealthy African Americans who play pro-basketball will not be tolerated, especially if it so happens that the privately expressed racist views are widely publicized, it is an entirely different matter when it comes to the expression of racism towards the poorest sectors of African American society, and toward other so-called “ethnic groups.” A case in point is the comment by Justice Scalia to Chickasaw Nation citizen Tom Cole. The fact that Cole is a duly elected and seated U.S. Congressman did not temper Scalia's acidic and racist tongue.

While I refuse to think or write of our Original Nations and Peoples as a “race” or “ethnic groups,” it is clearly a problem for a sitting Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court to avow that he regards us as a “race” that is inferior as a result of that claim that we have been “conquered,” or, in other words, “dominated.”

Certainly there is a vast difference between Donald Sterling and Antonin Scalia. After all, Donald Sterling was never going to referee any NBA games. It was not as though he has been forced out of the NBA to prevent him from being able to use his racist frame of reference to judge African American NBA players on the court, or use his racist views to influence the outcome of specific basketball games.

As for Justice Scalia, he has been on the U.S. Supreme Court for almost twenty-eight years, and during that time he has been using in his racist mental frame of our Original Nations (“Indians”) as a conquered (dominated) race in his decision-making in cases involving Indian issues. Why has his openly racist comment to Congressman Cole resulted in no public expression of outrage from the leadership in Indian Country? Why hasn't there been any persuasive campaign to have Scalia remove himself from any case involving American Indian nations and peoples?

The white male pundit on CNN who said that racism has pretty much ended in the United States has obviously never read Robert A. Williams' book Like A Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, and the Legal History of Racism in America (2005). Professor Williams makes it abundantly clear that U.S. federal Indian law is an entire sector of U.S. law that is a product of racist thinking that has been institutionalized in the United States. Where's the outrage over that in the U.S. media?

While I prefer to frame the discussion more in terms of “religious racism” based on what I term the Doctrine of Christian Discovery and Domination, Williams clearly demonstrates that U.S. federal Indian law is a system of ideas structured in terms of white superiority and non-white inferiority, which continues to be used by the U.S. Supreme Court in an anti-Indian manner to this very day. Anyone who would claim that racism has pretty much ended in the United States has no clue that the U.S. Supreme Court continues to make federal Indian law decisions based on racist precedents against our Original Nations and Peoples.

With regard to Justice Scalia's statement, Congressman Cole's office told me that he will not comment “on a private conversation.” His office did not say that the incident never happened, or that Scalia did not make that statement to representative Cole. His office simple characterized it as “private,” even though the congressman evidently later recounted Scalia's comment at a conference of lawyers in Oklahoma.

Steven Newcomb (Shawnee, Lenape) is co-founder and co-director of the Indigenous Law Institute and author of Pagans in the Promised Land: Decoding the Doctrine of Christian Discovery (Fulcrum, 2008). He has been studying federal Indian law and international law since the early 1980s, and has published several law review articles.

 

You need to be logged in in order to post comments
Please use the log in option at the bottom of this page

7

POST A COMMENT

Comments

Shadowwolf480's picture
Native Republican Congress Tom Cole might want to consider switching political parties. Because the ever growing racism espoused by his own party is evident everywhere and in his face. There is no shred of doubt that his constituents engage in anti-Indian sentiments and policy making behind his back. And that makes him one of two things: a "Lone Wolf" or an "Apple". If its the latter, he is against his own people. How pitiful to be in that unique position.
Shadowwolf480
Two Bears Growling's picture
Justice for all? Not if you are a person of color or Native! Who do these deceptive ones think they are fooling? They sure don't fool OUR people! We've seen all the ugliness these folks of European heritage have dished out to OUR people for well over 500 years. Some have changed & opened their hearts to others, but sadly, MANY people haven't changed towards those who are not people of color or Native. ................................................................................................................................. They may say their aren't biased of those who are not white, but just you go apply for a job or position in some of their universities, corporations, government offices & you will see a totally different side of these folks they hide from others. Try moving into their nice neighborhoods & you'll also see what I'm talking about! ................................................................................................................................. Racism, bigotry & elitism is FAR from being absent in society well over 50 years after laws were made to stomp it out. Laws may change in our favor, but many people fail to evolve & move beyond their personal bias, ignorance & stupidity.
Two Bears Growling
curtj's picture
It really makes no difference what political party he belongs to, Republican or Democrat, I feel that both are equally corrupt with legalized bribery and collusion between the elected politicians and the corporations that the corrupt members of the US Supreme Court are in collusion and in bed with. The Cherokee Trail of Tears where the 5 Tribes were forcibly removed from their lands by the colonists, was legalized around 1830, and the Chief justice, John Marshall, personally financially benefitted from legalizing the forced removal, by utilizing the lands the Indigenous were forcibly removed from. Fast forward to the 2002 Dick Cheney Secret Energy Task Force Meeting when Scalia himself voted to keep it a secret, shortly after spending 3 days hunting with Cheney. Our judges and Supreme Court justices have the ability to have conflict of interest and collusion relationships with the individuals and corporations they make legal rulings on. The Gulf of Mexico oil spill legal rulings in favor of the oil corporations, were done by a federal judge with investments in the oil companies implicated in the oil spill. The Appeals Court reaffirming his rulings was done by federal judges with professional, personal and investment relationships with the same companies. Our voiceless leaders refuse to hold the federal government accountable for the collusion and conflict of interest that goes into the legal rulings against the Indigenous.
curtj
rockymissouri's picture
I don't understand how Tom Cole can be a republican.....?? That was a reprehensible and DISGUSTING thing to say to ANYONE...!! IMO Scalia is unworthy to SERVE...as he does not serve ALL THE PEOPLE..IMO.
rockymissouri
softbreeze's picture
It's really too bad that a lot of these folks who espouse the sentiments of domination as an inherent, "God-given" right, don't stop and think about what their God instructed them to do. Which is to love others, give to those in need, not to steal or lie, etc. It seems to me that those who have tried to impose their Christian religion on those who were not Christian, were in much more need of the teachings than those they were trying to convert.
softbreeze
jaydokie's picture
Steven, I have a private question for you. Could you e-mail me your e-mail address at roundhousetalk@live.com? Thanks
jaydokie
noblethots's picture
racism in any form from anyone is unacceptable
noblethots